PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLC vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLC vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than ITOT's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PTLC has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 10.89%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.


PTLC

1D
1.44%
1M
1.62%
6M
4.27%
YTD
6.30%
1Y
17.02%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
10.89%
ALL TIME*
9.07%

ITOT

1D
1.46%
1M
1.37%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.61%
ALL TIME*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$218.20M$235.22M$304.20M
$5.24M$5.46M$6.01M

PTLC vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
6.30%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%17.58%1.49%21.41%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and ITOT is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2015

0.84

The correlation between PTLC and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (5 years) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLC vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTLC vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTLCITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.66

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.22

11.42

-4.19

PTLC vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTLC and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLCITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-55.20%

+28.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

-8.90%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

-19.44%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

-25.36%

+10.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

-35.00%

+8.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

0.00%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-6.93%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.07%

+0.29%

Volatility

PTLC vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLCITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.80%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.44%

10.35%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.25%

13.11%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

17.48%

-5.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.18%

18.28%

-5.10%

PTLC vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLC vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than ITOT's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.00%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PTLC and ITOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ITOT has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to PTLC (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTLC dropped -26.63% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 14.61% vs 10.89% for PTLC. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.

PTLC and ITOT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.00%.

PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLC and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer