PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTLC vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTLC vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTLC achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly lower than BUFX's 3.84% return.


PTLC

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.00%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
11.31%

BUFX

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.09%
YTD
3.84%
6M
3.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTLC vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PTLC and BUFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTLC vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTLC vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTLCBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

PTLC vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTLC vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTLC drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTLC and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLCBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.63%

-2.87%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-0.59%

-2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-0.24%

-5.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

PTLC vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLCBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

4.05%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.87%

4.05%

+7.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.19%

4.05%

+9.14%

PTLC vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTLC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTLC vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.03%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PTLC and BUFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

PTLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTLC and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTLC and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer