PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTL vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTL vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTL achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.46% return.


PTL

1D
-0.12%
1M
5.59%
YTD
17.90%
6M
15.73%
1Y
31.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.08%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTL vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
17.90%17.92%7.90%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
2.46%5.66%4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PTL and IBID is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTL vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTL
PTL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTL vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTLIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.94

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

13.33

-9.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.81

39.52

-23.71

PTL vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTL Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTL and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTLIBIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

3.91

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

2.56

-1.40

Drawdowns

PTL vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTL and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTLIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.72%

-1.28%

-18.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.57%

-0.36%

-7.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-0.22%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

0.12%

+1.91%

Volatility

PTL vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that PTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTLIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

0.32%

+3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

0.80%

+10.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.69%

1.25%

+13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

2.25%

+15.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

2.25%

+15.43%

PTL vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PTL vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

PTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IBID's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.66%4.43%4.24%0.81%
PTL
Inspire 500 ETF
1.09%1.24%0.92%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTL and IBID have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTL dropped -19.72% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, PTL leads with 31.98% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, PTL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PTL has performed better with a 31.98% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBID.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.09% for PTL.

PTL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PTL tracks Inspire 500 Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for PTL and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTL and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer