PTL vs. IBID
PTL (Inspire 500 ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Inspire 500 Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PTL returned 31.98% vs 4.83% for IBID. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTL charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
PTL vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTL achieves a 17.90% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.46% return.
PTL
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 17.90%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 31.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 2.46%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTL vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PTL Inspire 500 ETF | 17.90% | 17.92% | 7.90% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.46% | 5.66% | 4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTL and IBID is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTL vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
PTL
IBID
PTL vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTL | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.94 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | 13.33 | -9.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.81 | 39.52 | -23.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTL | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 3.91 | -1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.16 | 2.56 | -1.40 |
Drawdowns
PTL vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTL drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTL and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTL | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.72% | -1.28% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -0.36% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -0.22% | -2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 0.12% | +1.91% |
Volatility
PTL vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that PTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTL | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 0.32% | +3.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 0.80% | +10.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 1.25% | +13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 2.25% | +15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 2.25% | +15.43% |
PTL vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PTL vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
PTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IBID's 3.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.66% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
PTL Inspire 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.24% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTL and IBID have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTL has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTL dropped -19.72% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, PTL leads with 31.98% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, PTL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTL has performed better with a 31.98% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBID.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 1.09% for PTL.
PTL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PTL tracks Inspire 500 Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Inspire and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for PTL and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.91 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTL and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer