PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIR vs. XBTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIR vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -38.16% return, which is significantly lower than XBTY's -19.17% return.


PTIR

1D
-10.60%
1M
7.69%
YTD
-38.16%
6M
-34.27%
1Y
-8.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XBTY

1D
-2.23%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-19.17%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-35.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIR vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
-38.16%55.53%
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
-19.17%-21.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and XBTY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIR vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

XBTY
XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTIRXBTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

-1.25

+1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.60

-1.78

+2.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.79

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.78

+0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

-1.20

+1.00

PTIR vs. XBTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the XBTY Sharpe Ratio of -1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and XBTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTIRXBTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-1.25

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

-1.25

+3.48

Drawdowns

PTIR vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -69.10%, which is greater than XBTY's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and XBTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTIRXBTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.10%

-45.23%

-23.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.11%

-45.23%

-22.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.38%

-45.23%

-12.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.38%

-22.95%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.35%

29.35%

+10.00%

Volatility

PTIR vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 34.02% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 5.55%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTIRXBTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

34.02%

5.55%

+28.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

75.99%

18.20%

+57.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.25%

28.34%

+73.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

129.30%

28.01%

+101.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

129.30%

28.01%

+101.29%

PTIR vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XBTY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIR vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, less than XBTY's 239.89% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PTIR and XBTY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIR has higher volatility (34.02%) compared to XBTY (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -69.10% vs XBTY's -45.23%.

On 1-year performance, PTIR leads with -8.22% vs -35.32% for XBTY. On fees, XBTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PTIR has performed better with a -8.22% return vs -35.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 9.40% for PTIR.

PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XBTY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for PTIR and 0.99% for XBTY.

PTIR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIR and XBTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer