PTIR vs. XBTY
PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) and XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while XBTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PTIR returned -8.22% vs -35.32% for XBTY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTIR charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for XBTY.
Performance
PTIR vs. XBTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -38.16% return, which is significantly lower than XBTY's -19.17% return.
PTIR
- 1D
- -10.60%
- 1M
- 7.69%
- YTD
- -38.16%
- 6M
- -34.27%
- 1Y
- -8.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBTY
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -19.17%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -35.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR vs. XBTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -38.16% | 55.53% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -19.17% | -21.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIR and XBTY is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIR vs. XBTY — Risk / Return Rank
PTIR
XBTY
PTIR vs. XBTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTIR | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | -1.25 | +1.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.60 | -1.78 | +2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.79 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.78 | +0.67 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | -1.20 | +1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTIR | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | -1.25 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.23 | -1.25 | +3.48 |
Drawdowns
PTIR vs. XBTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -69.10%, which is greater than XBTY's maximum drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and XBTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIR | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.10% | -45.23% | -23.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.11% | -45.23% | -22.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.38% | -45.23% | -12.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -22.95% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.35% | 29.35% | +10.00% |
Volatility
PTIR vs. XBTY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 34.02% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) at 5.55%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIR | XBTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.02% | 5.55% | +28.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.99% | 18.20% | +57.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.25% | 28.34% | +73.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 129.30% | 28.01% | +101.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 129.30% | 28.01% | +101.29% |
PTIR vs. XBTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XBTY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIR vs. XBTY - Dividend Comparison
PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.40%, less than XBTY's 239.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 9.40% | 5.81% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 239.89% | 102.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIR and XBTY have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTIR has higher volatility (34.02%) compared to XBTY (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIR dropped -69.10% vs XBTY's -45.23%.
On 1-year performance, PTIR leads with -8.22% vs -35.32% for XBTY. On fees, XBTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PTIR has performed better with a -8.22% return vs -35.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.
XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 9.40% for PTIR.
PTIR is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while XBTY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for PTIR and 0.99% for XBTY.
PTIR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIR and XBTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer