PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIR vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PTIR vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PTIR vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PTIR
GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF
-38.76%221.36%-2.69%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-35.84%-26.70%-16.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIR achieves a -38.76% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -35.84% return.


PTIR

1D
12.66%
1M
10.24%
YTD
-38.76%
6M
-46.96%
1Y
94.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
9.07%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-35.84%
6M
-39.88%
1Y
34.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PTIR vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIR has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PTIR vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIR
PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIR vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTIRTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

0.32

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

1.26

+0.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.15

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

0.59

+0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

1.27

+1.64

PTIR vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIR Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIR and TSLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTIRTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

0.32

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

-0.44

+3.09

Correlation

The correlation between PTIR and TSLG is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PTIR vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.49%, less than TSLG's 10.20% yield.


Drawdowns

PTIR vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIR drawdown since its inception was -69.10%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIR and TSLG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PTIRTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.10%

-82.86%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.10%

-50.92%

-15.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.79%

-67.59%

+9.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.58%

-58.04%

+34.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.14%

23.82%

+6.32%

Volatility

PTIR vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a higher volatility of 29.23% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) at 22.28%. This indicates that PTIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PTIRTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.23%

22.28%

+6.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.19%

59.35%

+16.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

115.15%

110.61%

+4.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.12%

119.00%

+12.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

131.12%

119.00%

+12.12%