PTIN vs. SRVR
PTIN (Pacer Trendpilot International ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTIN is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTIN returned 6.53%/yr vs -0.32%/yr for SRVR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTIN charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
PTIN vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 22.80% return.
PTIN
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 6M
- 19.24%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 13.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 6M
- 23.13%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
PTIN vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 17.03% | 16.17% | 3.36% | 16.04% | -15.98% | 12.26% | -0.56% | 6.80% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 22.80% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 14.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIN and SRVR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.45 |
The correlation between PTIN and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTIN vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTIN
SRVR
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
PTIN
SRVR
Industrials
PTIN
SRVR
Technology
PTIN
SRVR
Healthcare
PTIN
SRVR
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTIN
SRVR
-
Basic Materials
PTIN
SRVR
Energy
PTIN
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
PTIN
SRVR
-
Communication Services
PTIN
SRVR
Utilities
PTIN
SRVR
Real Estate
PTIN
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIN vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PTIN
SRVR
PTIN vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PTIN | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.14 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.82 | 0.89 | +1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.79 | 1.93 | +8.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PTIN | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 0.78 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | -0.02 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.31 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
PTIN vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIN | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.27% | -40.99% | +19.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -14.78% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.93% | -18.34% | +4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.27% | -40.99% | +19.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -10.08% | +9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -15.26% | +7.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 6.83% | -3.81% |
Volatility
PTIN vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is 5.54%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that PTIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIN | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.07% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 13.31% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.26% | 16.90% | -0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 19.74% | -5.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 21.46% | -7.56% |
PTIN vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIN vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than SRVR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIN Pacer Trendpilot International ETF | 2.17% | 2.53% | 2.67% | 2.09% | 0.41% | 2.38% | 0.77% | 0.97% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.86% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIN and SRVR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to PTIN (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.53% vs -0.32% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.53% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.17% for PTIN.
PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SRVR is REIT. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.60% for SRVR.
PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIN and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer