PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIN vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIN vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 18.60% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 11.13% return.


PTIN

1D
0.12%
1M
0.72%
6M
10.29%
YTD
18.60%
1Y
33.07%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.18%

SRVR

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.61%
6M
4.15%
YTD
11.13%
1Y
2.29%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
-2.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$434.65K$363.43K$473.04K
$2.69M$2.33M$2.66M

PTIN vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
18.60%16.17%3.36%16.04%-15.98%12.26%-0.56%6.75%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
11.13%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%16.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and SRVR is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019

0.45

The correlation between PTIN and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIN vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTIN vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTINSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.04

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

0.15

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.59

0.36

+10.23

PTIN vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTINSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-40.99%

+19.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-15.01%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-18.34%

+4.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-40.99%

+19.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-18.62%

+18.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.55%

-15.30%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

6.30%

-3.17%

Volatility

PTIN vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is 4.96%, while Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that PTIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTINSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

5.66%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.78%

14.37%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.69%

17.62%

+0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.75%

19.94%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.12%

21.40%

-7.28%

PTIN vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIN vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than SRVR's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.14%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF
2.75%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTIN and SRVR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to PTIN (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, PTIN leads with 6.92% vs -2.90% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, PTIN has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTIN has performed better with a 6.92% return vs -2.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.14% for PTIN.

PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while SRVR is REIT. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.49% for SRVR.

PTIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIN and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer