PTIAX vs. MINV
PTIAX (Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund) and MINV (Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF) are both funds - PTIAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by Performance Trust Asset Management, while MINV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund actively managed by Matthews. Over the past 3 years, PTIAX returned 5.36%/yr vs 31.39%/yr for MINV. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTIAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MINV.
Performance
PTIAX vs. MINV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTIAX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than MINV's 51.67% return.
PTIAX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 5.92%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.93%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
MINV
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 2.16%
- YTD
- 51.67%
- 6M
- 53.62%
- 1Y
- 81.42%
- 3Y*
- 31.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIAX vs. MINV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund | 1.06% | 6.92% | 3.52% | 7.48% | -3.02% |
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 51.67% | 30.85% | 17.32% | -2.66% | -2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTIAX and MINV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | 0.14 |
The correlation between PTIAX and MINV shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (3 years) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTIAX vs. MINV — Risk / Return Rank
PTIAX
MINV
PTIAX vs. MINV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTIAX | MINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.51 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 7.23 | -5.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 18.28 | -12.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTIAX vs. MINV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTIAX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum MINV drawdown of -23.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIAX and MINV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTIAX | MINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.90% | -23.49% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -10.91% | +7.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.96% | -19.82% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -6.24% | +5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -8.06% | +5.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 4.31% | -3.24% |
Volatility
PTIAX vs. MINV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) is 1.38%, while Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF (MINV) has a volatility of 13.99%. This indicates that PTIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTIAX | MINV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.38% | 13.99% | -12.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 23.75% | -20.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.99% | 27.05% | -23.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 24.22% | -19.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.05% | 24.22% | -20.17% |
PTIAX vs. MINV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTIAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than MINV's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTIAX vs. MINV - Dividend Comparison
PTIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, more than MINV's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MINV Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | 1.00% | 1.51% | 0.25% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIAX Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund | 4.75% | 4.68% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 3.96% | 3.01% | 3.86% | 4.11% | 4.47% | 5.51% | 5.49% | 4.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTIAX and MINV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MINV has higher volatility (13.99%) compared to PTIAX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIAX dropped -16.90% vs MINV's -23.49%.
MINV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTIAX and MINV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer