PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIAX vs. IAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIAX vs. IAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIAX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -2.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PTIAX has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 2.88%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.


PTIAX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.54%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
5.36%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.88%

IAU

1D
0.08%
1M
-9.54%
YTD
-2.44%
6M
-2.22%
1Y
22.32%
3Y*
29.07%
5Y*
17.23%
10Y*
12.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIAX vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTIAX
Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund
1.06%6.92%3.52%7.48%-12.84%1.15%5.73%7.36%2.01%7.08%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
-2.44%63.95%26.85%12.84%-0.63%-4.00%25.03%17.98%-1.76%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIAX and IAU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011

0.27

The correlation between PTIAX and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.32 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIAX vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIAX
PTIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PTIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

IAU
IAU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAU Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIAX vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTIAXIAUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.19

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.99

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

2.83

+2.70

PTIAX vs. IAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the IAU Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIAX and IAU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTIAX vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIAX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIAX and IAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTIAXIAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.90%

-45.14%

+28.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-24.40%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.96%

-24.40%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-24.40%

+7.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.90%

-24.40%

+7.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-22.03%

+20.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-15.97%

+13.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

8.47%

-7.40%

Volatility

PTIAX vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund (PTIAX) is 1.38%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 7.70%. This indicates that PTIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTIAXIAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.38%

7.70%

-6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.85%

23.94%

-21.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

27.17%

-23.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.98%

18.16%

-13.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.05%

16.02%

-11.97%

PTIAX vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIAX vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison

PTIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.75%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTIAX
Performance Trust Strategic Bond Fund
4.75%4.68%4.44%4.03%3.96%3.01%3.86%4.11%4.47%5.51%5.49%4.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTIAX and IAU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IAU has higher volatility (7.70%) compared to PTIAX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIAX dropped -16.90% vs IAU's -45.14%.

PTIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIAX and IAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer