PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 42.26% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 6.35% return.


PTF

1D
-3.81%
1M
-20.00%
6M
31.78%
YTD
42.26%
1Y
60.82%
3Y*
29.39%
5Y*
18.13%
10Y*
23.75%

WNTR

1D
0.37%
1M
20.43%
6M
21.18%
YTD
6.35%
1Y
117.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PTF and WNTR is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTFWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.78

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

7.13

+3.06

PTF vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTF vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-42.65%

-12.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.86%

-42.65%

+20.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.36%

-13.23%

-8.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.25%

-20.49%

+7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

16.62%

-10.63%

Volatility

PTF vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 22.58% compared to YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) at 18.90%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.58%

18.90%

+3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.35%

47.35%

-10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.58%

53.75%

-8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.62%

53.51%

-16.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.83%

53.51%

-19.68%

PTF vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than WNTR's 105.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
105.78%58.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and WNTR have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (22.58%) compared to WNTR (18.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 117.98% vs 60.82% for PTF. On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 117.98% return vs 60.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 105.78%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PTF is categorized as Momentum, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer