PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 41.44% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 16.04% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed SPVM with an annualized return of 23.35%, while SPVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.21% annualized return.


PTF

1D
6.41%
1M
-4.61%
6M
23.32%
YTD
41.44%
1Y
53.98%
3Y*
30.70%
5Y*
16.16%
10Y*
23.35%
ALL TIME*
13.87%

SPVM

1D
0.41%
1M
3.08%
6M
10.95%
YTD
16.04%
1Y
29.80%
3Y*
18.93%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
12.21%
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.15M$20.80M$16.47M
$935.98K$1.13M$1.23M

PTF vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
41.44%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
16.04%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%29.33%-9.17%14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and SPVM is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between PTF and SPVM has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PTF vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTF
SPVM

Technology

94.7%
6.2%

Communication Services

4.5%
2.7%

Industrials

1.8%
9.4%

Energy

1.6%
11.8%

Financial Services

0.8%
36.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Healthcare

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

2.1%

Utilities

-

13.4%

Technology

PTF
94.7%
SPVM
6.2%

Communication Services

PTF
4.5%
SPVM
2.7%

Industrials

PTF
1.8%
SPVM
9.4%

Energy

PTF
1.6%
SPVM
11.8%

Financial Services

PTF
0.8%
SPVM
36.8%

Basic Materials

PTF

-

SPVM
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PTF

-

SPVM
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

PTF

-

SPVM
4.7%

Healthcare

PTF

-

SPVM
8.6%

Real Estate

PTF

-

SPVM
2.1%

Utilities

PTF

-

SPVM
13.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTF vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTFSPVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.47

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

4.56

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.17

17.56

-11.39

PTF vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTF vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than SPVM's maximum drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFSPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-45.35%

-10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.59%

-6.57%

-32.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.59%

-18.66%

-19.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-19.48%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-45.35%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.81%

-0.60%

-21.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-4.94%

-8.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.81%

1.70%

+7.11%

Volatility

PTF vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 27.09% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.03%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFSPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.09%

3.03%

+24.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.61%

7.72%

+35.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.31%

11.34%

+39.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.11%

16.56%

+21.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.66%

19.51%

+15.15%

PTF vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPVM's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTF
Invesco Dorsey Wright Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.91%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and SPVM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (27.09%) compared to SPVM (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 23.35% vs 12.21% for SPVM. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 23.35% return vs 12.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PTF tracks Dorsey Wright Technology Technical Leaders Index, while SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer