PTF vs. SPHD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 26.93%/yr vs 7.08%/yr for SPHD. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.

Performance

PTF vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 77.58% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 26.93%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.08% annualized return.

PTF

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 19.05%
• YTD: 77.58%
• 6M: 74.93%
• 1Y: 109.08%
• 3Y*: 43.28%
• 5Y*: 23.79%
• 10Y*: 26.93%

SPHD

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: -0.82%
• YTD: 4.38%
• 6M: 4.63%
• 1Y: 8.12%
• 3Y*: 11.42%
• 5Y*: 5.48%
• 10Y*: 7.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF	77.58%	5.68%	43.65%	33.73%	-31.75%	18.10%	82.06%	46.71%	0.01%	32.07%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.38%	3.41%	18.08%	1.32%	0.58%	24.98%	-9.98%	20.26%	-6.17%	11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and SPHD is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2012	0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between PTF and SPHD has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PTF vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTF	SPHD
Technology	92.9%	1.5%
Communication Services	5.8%	8.6%
Industrials	1.8%	0.0%
Energy	1.6%	14.1%
Financial Services	1.4%	15.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	17.8%
Healthcare	-	5.1%
Real Estate	-	20.1%
Utilities	-	13.7%

Return for Risk

PTF vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF

PTF Risk / Return Rank: 82
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 93

SPHD

SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 21
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PTF	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	0.74	+2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	1.15	+2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.13	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.10	1.11	+4.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.27	2.78	+21.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PTF vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PTF	SPHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	0.74	+2.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.68	0.39	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	0.40	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.58	-0.04

Drawdowns

PTF vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and SPHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTF	SPHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.38%	-41.39%	-13.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.99%	-7.33%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.11%	-13.29%	-22.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.88%	-19.50%	-25.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.88%	-41.39%	-3.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.37%	+5.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.27%	-4.70%	-8.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.51%	2.93%	+1.58%

Volatility

PTF vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTF	SPHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.27%	2.99%	+10.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.47%	7.55%	+21.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.39%	11.04%	+27.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.95%	14.16%	+20.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.94%	17.64%	+15.30%

PTF vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTF vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF	0.01%	0.21%	0.00%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.04%	0.26%	0.00%
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF	4.62%	4.02%	3.41%	4.48%	3.89%	3.45%	4.89%	4.07%	4.40%	3.14%	3.83%	3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTF and SPHD in my portfolio?

PTF and SPHD have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTF or SPHD?

PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

Which ETF is better, PTF or SPHD?

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.93% vs 7.08% for SPHD. On fees, SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTF or SPHD?

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 7.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTF or SPHD?

SPHD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTF or SPHD?

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

What is the main difference between PTF and SPHD?

PTF is categorized as Momentum, while SPHD is Dividend. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.30% for SPHD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.