PTF vs. QTUM
PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTF returned 21.88%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.
Performance
PTF vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 69.64% return, which is significantly higher than QTUM's 47.39% return.
PTF
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 66.68%
- 1Y
- 95.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 26.39%
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
PTF vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 69.64% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | -23.23% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and QTUM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PTF and QTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
PTF vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
QTUM
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PTF
QTUM
Communication Services
PTF
QTUM
Industrials
PTF
QTUM
Energy
PTF
QTUM
-
Financial Services
PTF
QTUM
-
Basic Materials
PTF
-
QTUM
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
QTUM
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
QTUM
-
Healthcare
PTF
-
QTUM
Real Estate
PTF
-
QTUM
-
Utilities
PTF
-
QTUM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
QTUM
PTF vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.36 | 5.46 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.45 | 19.77 | +0.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -38.45% | -16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -15.26% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -25.39% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -38.45% | -6.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -4.42% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -8.24% | -5.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 4.21% | +0.50% |
Volatility
PTF vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 14.18%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 14.18% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.97% | 23.17% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.36% | 28.39% | +11.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 26.99% | +8.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 27.40% | +5.76% |
PTF vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than QTUM's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and QTUM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 28.09% vs 21.88% for PTF. On fees, QTUM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, QTUM has been the lower-risk option at 14.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 28.09% return vs 21.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTUM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while QTUM is Technology Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.40% for QTUM.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer