PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PTF vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PTF vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
16.91%5.68%43.65%17.73%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
-11.04%22.99%63.97%37.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 16.91% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -11.04% return.


PTF

1D
3.59%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
16.91%
6M
18.08%
1Y
50.40%
3Y*
27.21%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
21.87%

MAGS

1D
1.28%
1M
-4.76%
YTD
-11.04%
6M
-8.69%
1Y
27.53%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PTF vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTFMAGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

0.97

+0.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

1.58

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

1.60

+1.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.46

5.57

+4.89

PTF vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTFMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

0.97

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

1.36

-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and MAGS is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PTF vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MAGS's 1.66% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.66%1.48%0.81%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PTF vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and MAGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-29.91%

-25.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-18.62%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-13.78%

+7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.38%

-4.77%

-8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

5.36%

-0.42%

Volatility

PTF vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.26% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 8.50%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PTFMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.26%

8.50%

+7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.61%

15.51%

+17.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.01%

28.70%

+10.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.82%

26.28%

+8.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.57%

26.28%

+6.29%