PTF vs. KCE
PTF (Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF) and KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTF is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTF returned 26.39%/yr vs 17.65%/yr for KCE. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KCE.
Performance
PTF vs. KCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 69.64% return, which is significantly higher than KCE's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed KCE with an annualized return of 26.39%, while KCE has yielded a comparatively lower 17.65% annualized return.
PTF
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 69.64%
- 6M
- 66.68%
- 1Y
- 95.99%
- 3Y*
- 39.34%
- 5Y*
- 21.88%
- 10Y*
- 26.39%
KCE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.65%
PTF vs. KCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 69.64% | 5.68% | 43.65% | 33.73% | -31.75% | 18.10% | 82.06% | 46.71% | 0.01% | 32.07% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 3.66% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 32.04% | -22.14% | 40.05% | 30.82% | 27.13% | -15.63% | 32.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTF and KCE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.65 |
The correlation between PTF and KCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PTF vs. KCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTF
KCE
Technology
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
PTF
KCE
Communication Services
PTF
KCE
-
Industrials
PTF
KCE
-
Energy
PTF
KCE
-
Financial Services
PTF
KCE
Basic Materials
PTF
-
KCE
-
Consumer Cyclical
PTF
-
KCE
-
Consumer Defensive
PTF
-
KCE
-
Healthcare
PTF
-
KCE
-
Real Estate
PTF
-
KCE
-
Utilities
PTF
-
KCE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTF vs. KCE — Risk / Return Rank
PTF
KCE
PTF vs. KCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTF | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.13 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.36 | 0.82 | +4.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.45 | 2.14 | +18.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTF vs. KCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum KCE drawdown of -74.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and KCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTF | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.38% | -74.00% | +18.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.99% | -17.44% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.11% | -26.31% | -9.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.88% | -34.45% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.88% | -40.78% | -4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.47% | -3.75% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.26% | -22.78% | +9.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 6.70% | -1.99% |
Volatility
PTF vs. KCE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) at 6.04%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTF | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.30% | 6.04% | +10.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.97% | 15.31% | +16.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.36% | 20.12% | +20.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.34% | 23.08% | +12.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.16% | 23.10% | +10.06% |
PTF vs. KCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than KCE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTF vs. KCE - Dividend Comparison
PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than KCE's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.67% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
PTF Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTF and KCE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to KCE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs KCE's -74.00%.
On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.39% vs 17.65% for KCE. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.39% return vs 17.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.
PTF is categorized as Momentum, while KCE is Financials Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.35% for KCE.
PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTF and KCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer