PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. IDMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 77.58% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 7.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed IDMO with an annualized return of 26.93%, while IDMO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.09% annualized return.


PTF

1D
0.27%
1M
19.05%
YTD
77.58%
6M
74.93%
1Y
109.08%
3Y*
43.28%
5Y*
23.79%
10Y*
26.93%

IDMO

1D
-1.16%
1M
2.20%
YTD
7.74%
6M
12.22%
1Y
23.09%
3Y*
25.70%
5Y*
15.53%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
77.58%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
7.74%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and IDMO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.46

The correlation between PTF and IDMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTF vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTF
IDMO

Technology

92.9%
5.3%

Communication Services

5.8%
2.2%

Industrials

1.8%
22.6%

Energy

1.6%
1.9%

Financial Services

1.4%
42.4%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

8.4%

Technology

PTF
92.9%
IDMO
5.3%

Communication Services

PTF
5.8%
IDMO
2.2%

Industrials

PTF
1.8%
IDMO
22.6%

Energy

PTF
1.6%
IDMO
1.9%

Financial Services

PTF
1.4%
IDMO
42.4%

Basic Materials

PTF

-

IDMO
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PTF

-

IDMO
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PTF

-

IDMO
2.5%

Healthcare

PTF

-

IDMO
1.2%

Real Estate

PTF

-

IDMO
2.0%

Utilities

PTF

-

IDMO
8.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTFIDMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.10

1.88

+4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.27

7.84

+16.43

PTF vs. IDMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the IDMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and IDMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTFIDMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86

1.37

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.88

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.67

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.45

+0.08

Drawdowns

PTF vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, which is greater than IDMO's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and IDMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFIDMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-39.38%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-12.31%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.11%

-12.65%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-27.07%

-17.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-31.34%

-13.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.31%

+2.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-9.76%

-3.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

2.95%

+1.56%

Volatility

PTF vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 13.27% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) at 6.43%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFIDMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.27%

6.43%

+6.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.47%

14.91%

+14.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.39%

16.89%

+21.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.95%

17.84%

+17.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

18.12%

+14.82%

PTF vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than IDMO's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.53%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and IDMO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (13.27%) compared to IDMO (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs IDMO's -39.38%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.93% vs 12.09% for IDMO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.93% return vs 12.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTF.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.01% for PTF.

PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.25% for IDMO.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and IDMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer