PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTF vs. FXL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTF vs. FXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTF achieves a 69.64% return, which is significantly higher than FXL's 25.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PTF has outperformed FXL with an annualized return of 26.39%, while FXL has yielded a comparatively lower 20.76% annualized return.


PTF

1D
1.49%
1M
4.93%
YTD
69.64%
6M
66.68%
1Y
99.51%
3Y*
39.34%
5Y*
21.88%
10Y*
26.39%

FXL

1D
1.27%
1M
9.18%
YTD
25.90%
6M
24.57%
1Y
41.44%
3Y*
23.41%
5Y*
11.96%
10Y*
20.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTF vs. FXL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
69.64%5.68%43.65%33.73%-31.75%18.10%82.06%46.71%0.01%32.07%
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
25.90%13.29%16.13%40.50%-30.44%18.20%54.20%38.66%2.72%35.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PTF and FXL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2007

0.88

The correlation between PTF and FXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTF vs. FXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTF
FXL

Technology

93.8%
88.5%

Communication Services

4.7%
4.8%

Industrials

1.8%
3.8%

Energy

1.6%

-

Financial Services

1.5%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PTF
93.8%
FXL
88.5%

Communication Services

PTF
4.7%
FXL
4.8%

Industrials

PTF
1.8%
FXL
3.8%

Energy

PTF
1.6%
FXL

-

Financial Services

PTF
1.5%
FXL
1.0%

Basic Materials

PTF

-

FXL

-

Consumer Cyclical

PTF

-

FXL
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

PTF

-

FXL

-

Healthcare

PTF

-

FXL

-

Real Estate

PTF

-

FXL

-

Utilities

PTF

-

FXL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTF vs. FXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTF
PTF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PTF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTF Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PTF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

FXL
FXL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXL Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTF vs. FXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) and First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTFFXLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.28

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.36

2.89

+2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.45

9.33

+11.12

PTF vs. FXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTF Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the FXL Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTF and FXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTF vs. FXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTF drawdown since its inception was -55.38%, smaller than the maximum FXL drawdown of -61.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTF and FXL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTFFXLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.38%

-61.41%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.99%

-13.56%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.11%

-28.27%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.88%

-38.49%

-6.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.88%

-38.49%

-6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-5.44%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.26%

-11.36%

-1.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

4.19%

+0.52%

Volatility

PTF vs. FXL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF (PTF) has a higher volatility of 16.30% compared to First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund (FXL) at 11.12%. This indicates that PTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTFFXLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.30%

11.12%

+5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.97%

19.36%

+12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.36%

23.86%

+16.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.34%

25.37%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.16%

25.41%

+7.75%

PTF vs. FXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FXL's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTF vs. FXL - Dividend Comparison

PTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while FXL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXL
First Trust Technology AlphaDEX Fund
0.00%0.01%0.11%0.41%0.34%0.11%0.04%0.37%0.32%0.27%1.12%0.36%
PTF
Invesco DWA Technology Momentum ETF
0.01%0.21%0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.08%0.04%0.26%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTF and FXL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTF has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to FXL (11.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTF dropped -55.38% vs FXL's -61.41%.

On 10-year performance, PTF leads with 26.39% vs 20.76% for FXL. On fees, PTF is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, FXL has been the lower-risk option at 11.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PTF has performed better with a 26.39% return vs 20.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTF is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXL.

PTF has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for FXL.

PTF is categorized as Momentum, while FXL is Technology Equities. PTF tracks DWA Technology Technical Leaders Index, while FXL tracks StrataQuant Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTF and 0.61% for FXL.

PTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTF and FXL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer