PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTCIX vs. PCN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTCIX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Long-Term Credit Bond Fund (PTCIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTCIX achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, PTCIX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of 2.78%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.14% annualized return.


PTCIX

1D
0.23%
1M
1.89%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.33%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
-1.74%
10Y*
2.78%

PCN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
1.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
7.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTCIX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTCIX
PIMCO Long-Term Credit Bond Fund
1.07%8.56%-0.06%9.20%-27.04%-1.00%13.28%24.99%-5.92%13.56%
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
-4.37%5.55%19.52%16.22%-22.88%6.93%-2.19%39.10%-5.94%26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PTCIX and PCN is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.12

The correlation between PTCIX and PCN shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTCIX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTCIX
PTCIX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PTCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
PTCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PCN
PCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTCIX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Long-Term Credit Bond Fund (PTCIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTCIXPCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.04

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

0.13

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.46

0.39

+4.07

PTCIX vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTCIX and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTCIXPCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

0.14

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.04

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.39

+0.19

Drawdowns

PTCIX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTCIX drawdown since its inception was -35.64%, smaller than the maximum PCN drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTCIX and PCN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTCIXPCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.64%

-61.12%

+25.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-10.40%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.35%

-22.53%

+9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.64%

-33.39%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.64%

-50.27%

+14.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.53%

-6.87%

-7.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-7.20%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.56%

-1.50%

Volatility

PTCIX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Long-Term Credit Bond Fund (PTCIX) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 2.35%. This indicates that PTCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTCIXPCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

2.35%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.07%

6.97%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.17%

9.61%

-1.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

16.18%

-4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.47%

21.94%

-11.47%

PTCIX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTCIX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTCIX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PTCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, less than PCN's 11.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
11.58%10.58%10.06%10.88%12.66%7.89%7.83%7.37%9.60%7.85%11.98%10.22%
PTCIX
PIMCO Long-Term Credit Bond Fund
5.80%5.67%5.23%3.83%4.86%7.39%7.72%5.14%6.51%4.81%5.75%14.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTCIX and PCN have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTCIX has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to PCN (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTCIX dropped -35.64% vs PCN's -61.12%.

PTCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTCIX and PCN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer