PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTBD vs. COWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PTBD vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PTBD vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
-0.70%2.49%4.24%8.84%-0.98%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-3.92%10.24%34.99%20.69%-0.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTBD achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -3.92% return.


PTBD

1D
0.26%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
-0.70%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
-0.28%
3Y*
4.34%
5Y*
-1.72%
10Y*

COWG

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-7.05%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PTBD vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTBD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PTBD vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTBD
PTBD Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

COWG
COWG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTBD vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTBDCOWGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.06

0.41

-0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.05

0.74

-0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.10

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

0.79

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.01

2.55

-2.54

PTBD vs. COWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTBD Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the COWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTBD and COWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTBDCOWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

0.41

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.93

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between PTBD and COWG is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PTBD vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

PTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, more than COWG's 0.35% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
5.45%5.62%6.56%6.55%6.14%2.70%2.50%0.62%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.35%0.32%0.40%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PTBD vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTBD drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTBD and COWG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PTBDCOWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-23.60%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.36%

-12.96%

+9.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.40%

-7.98%

-2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.19%

-3.36%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.35%

4.00%

-2.65%

Volatility

PTBD vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) is 1.93%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that PTBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PTBDCOWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

5.87%

-3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.82%

13.24%

-10.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.54%

22.50%

-17.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.23%

19.32%

-12.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.88%

19.32%

-11.44%