PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSWD vs. CHPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSWD vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 68.49% return.


PSWD

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.30%
6M
26.74%
YTD
26.31%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.24%

CHPS

1D
0.66%
1M
-13.02%
6M
42.22%
YTD
68.49%
1Y
137.92%
3Y*
46.45%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
46.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.30M$2.47M$3.85M
$62.12K$66.88K$71.33K

PSWD vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
26.31%1.69%9.46%18.58%
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
68.49%58.47%7.75%10.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD and CHPS is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.49

The correlation between PSWD and CHPS shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSWD vs. CHPS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSWD
CHPS

Technology

98.1%
99.6%

Industrials

1.1%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Communication Services

0.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.1%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
0.0%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
0.0%

Energy

0.0%
0.6%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Technology

PSWD
98.1%
CHPS
99.6%

Industrials

PSWD
1.1%
CHPS
0.4%

Real Estate

PSWD
0.4%
CHPS

-

Communication Services

PSWD
0.1%
CHPS
0.0%

Financial Services

PSWD
0.1%
CHPS
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PSWD
0.1%
CHPS
0.0%

Healthcare

PSWD
0.1%
CHPS

-

Consumer Defensive

PSWD
0.0%
CHPS
0.0%

Energy

PSWD
0.0%
CHPS
0.6%

Utilities

PSWD
0.0%
CHPS

-

Basic Materials

PSWD
0.0%
CHPS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSWD vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSWD
PSWD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PSWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPS
CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSWD vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSWDCHPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.42

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

4.14

-3.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

17.64

-15.86

PSWD vs. CHPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the CHPS Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD and CHPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSWD vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and CHPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSWDCHPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-39.44%

+15.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.70%

-32.74%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-39.44%

+15.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-26.00%

+19.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-9.36%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

7.66%

+2.89%

Volatility

PSWD vs. CHPS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) is 8.88%, while Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that PSWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSWDCHPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

19.82%

-10.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.02%

40.35%

-17.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

45.70%

-18.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.05%

37.29%

-13.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

37.29%

-13.24%

PSWD vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PSWD vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than CHPS's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CHPS
Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF
0.39%0.68%1.75%0.36%
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
0.62%0.88%1.49%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSWD and CHPS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPS has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to PSWD (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs CHPS's -39.44%.

On 3-year performance, CHPS leads with 46.45% vs 17.15% for PSWD. On fees, CHPS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PSWD has been the lower-risk option at 8.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CHPS has performed better with a 46.45% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CHPS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for PSWD.

PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.39% for CHPS.

PSWD is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while CHPS tracks Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.15% for CHPS.

CHPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSWD and CHPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer