PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PSWD.DE (Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - PSWD.DE tracks the FTSE RAFI All-World 3000 while ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSWD.DE returned 13.34%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSWD.DE charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.

Performance

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD.DE achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than ETLQ.DE's 10.88% return.

PSWD.DE

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 16.46%
• 6M: 17.75%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 13.34%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

ETLQ.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 10.88%
• 6M: 11.36%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 17.73%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PSWD.DE Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF	16.46%	14.64%	17.68%	12.73%	-3.63%	31.90%	-3.90%	18.93%
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	10.88%	8.14%	26.10%	20.83%	-13.64%	32.63%	5.63%	24.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2019	0.86

The correlation between PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSWD.DE

PSWD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 91
PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PSWD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSWD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSWD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PSWD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ETLQ.DE

ETLQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ETLQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ETLQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ETLQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ETLQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSWD.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	2.13	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.17	2.98	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.58	1.39	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.56	3.56	+1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.39	14.23	+8.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the ETLQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSWD.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	2.13	+0.97
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00	0.92	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.93	-0.25

Drawdowns

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.39%, which is greater than ETLQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSWD.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.39%	-33.38%	-3.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.89%	-6.68%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.19%	-21.58%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.19%	-21.58%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.31%	-0.34%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-4.33%	-0.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.46%	1.68%	-0.22%

Volatility

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSWD.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) at 2.68%. This indicates that PSWD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETLQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSWD.DE	ETLQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	2.68%	+0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.86%	7.77%	+0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.54%	11.18%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.16%	14.06%	-0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	15.74%	-0.55%

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD.DE has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSWD.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

PSWD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while ETLQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSWD.DE Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF	1.75%	2.03%	2.27%	2.48%	2.66%	1.92%	1.98%	2.37%	2.56%	2.06%	1.97%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE in my portfolio?

PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSWD.DE or ETLQ.DE?

On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSWD.DE or ETLQ.DE?

ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSWD.DE.

What is the main difference between PSWD.DE and ETLQ.DE?

PSWD.DE tracks FTSE RAFI All-World 3000, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSWD.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.