PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSTP vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSTP vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (PSTP) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSTP achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 23.61% return.


PSTP

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.37%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.31%
1Y
11.84%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-1.21%
1M
-0.63%
YTD
23.61%
6M
19.86%
1Y
37.34%
3Y*
11.44%
5Y*
7.71%
10Y*
4.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSTP vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PSTP
Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
3.11%10.36%13.56%13.64%-2.80%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
23.61%8.07%5.97%-5.63%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PSTP and FAAR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022

-0.01

The correlation between PSTP and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to -0.01 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSTP vs. FAAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSTP
FAAR

Technology

36.2%

-

Financial Services

11.9%
100.0%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

PSTP
36.2%
FAAR

-

Financial Services

PSTP
11.9%
FAAR
100.0%

Communication Services

PSTP
10.9%
FAAR

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSTP
10.1%
FAAR

-

Healthcare

PSTP
8.4%
FAAR

-

Industrials

PSTP
8.1%
FAAR

-

Consumer Defensive

PSTP
4.9%
FAAR

-

Energy

PSTP
3.5%
FAAR

-

Utilities

PSTP
2.3%
FAAR

-

Real Estate

PSTP
1.9%
FAAR

-

Basic Materials

PSTP
1.8%
FAAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSTP vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSTP
PSTP Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
PSTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSTP Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PSTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSTP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSTP vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (PSTP) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSTPFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

7.74

-5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

21.53

-10.27

PSTP vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSTP Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSTP and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSTPFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

2.77

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.43

+0.52

Drawdowns

PSTP vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSTP drawdown since its inception was -12.46%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTP and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTPFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.46%

-18.03%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.11%

-4.85%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.38%

-11.54%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-2.77%

+1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-7.84%

+5.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.74%

-0.69%

Volatility

PSTP vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF (PSTP) is 1.55%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.43%. This indicates that PSTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTPFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.55%

2.43%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

9.79%

-4.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

13.55%

-7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.25%

13.02%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.25%

11.52%

-2.27%

PSTP vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSTP has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSTP vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

PSTP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.31%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
PSTP
Innovator Power Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSTP and FAAR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to PSTP (1.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSTP dropped -12.46% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 3-year performance, FAAR leads with 11.44% vs 10.90% for PSTP. On fees, PSTP is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, PSTP has been the lower-risk option at 1.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FAAR has performed better with a 11.44% return vs 10.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSTP is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.31%, compared with 0.00% for PSTP.

PSTP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for PSTP and 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSTP and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer