PSTIX vs. PCN

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PSTIX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund) and PCN (PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PSTIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by PIMCO, while PCN is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PSTIX returned -9.92%/yr vs 6.93%/yr for PCN. Their -0.28 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PSTIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for PCN.

Performance

PSTIX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSTIX achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than PCN's -2.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PSTIX has underperformed PCN with an annualized return of -9.92%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively higher 6.93% annualized return.

PSTIX

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: -4.53%
• YTD: -5.26%
• 1Y: -10.18%
• 3Y*: -8.25%
• 5Y*: -5.88%
• 10Y*: -9.92%
• ALL TIME*: -7.70%

PCN

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: -0.99%
• 6M: -3.91%
• YTD: -2.68%
• 1Y: 2.62%
• 3Y*: 5.39%
• 5Y*: 0.50%
• 10Y*: 6.93%
• ALL TIME*: 9.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	$3.20M	$3.68M	$3.66M
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PSTIX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	-5.26%	-8.24%	-11.28%	-11.01%	17.41%	-21.89%	-20.83%	-20.27%	5.21%	-14.04%
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	-2.68%	5.55%	19.52%	16.22%	-22.88%	6.93%	-2.19%	39.10%	-5.94%	26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PSTIX and PCN is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.37
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	-0.32
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	-0.37
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	-0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2004	-0.28

Return for Risk

PSTIX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSTIX

PSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 1
PSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
PSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

PCN

PCN Risk / Return Rank: 9
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 9
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSTIX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSTIX	PCN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	0.27	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.88	0.46	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.06	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.54	0.26	-0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.01	0.66	-1.67

PSTIX vs. PCN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSTIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the PCN Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSTIX and PCN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSTIX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSTIX drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, which is greater than PCN's maximum drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTIX and PCN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSTIX	PCN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.52%	-61.12%	-29.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-10.40%	-4.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.92%	-22.53%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.53%	-33.39%	-4.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.42%	-50.27%	-17.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.23%	-5.22%	-85.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.40%	-7.19%	-50.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.99%	4.09%	+3.90%

Volatility

PSTIX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 2.37%. This indicates that PSTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSTIX	PCN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	2.37%	+0.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.63%	7.44%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.47%	10.01%	+2.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.56%	16.17%	+0.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.50%	21.91%	-4.41%

PSTIX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSTIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSTIX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison

PSTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than PCN's 11.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	11.60%	10.58%	10.06%	10.88%	12.66%	7.89%	7.83%	7.37%	9.60%	7.85%	11.98%	10.22%
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	4.09%	1.16%	0.68%	5.06%	1.23%	1.26%	1.68%	0.00%	3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSTIX and PCN in my portfolio?

PSTIX and PCN have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSTIX or PCN?

PSTIX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PCN (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSTIX dropped -90.52% vs PCN's -61.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.