PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PST vs. TTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PST vs. TTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than TTT's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PST has outperformed TTT with an annualized return of 2.73%, while TTT has yielded a comparatively lower -0.85% annualized return.


PST

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
4.69%
6M
5.06%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
2.73%

TTT

1D
-0.36%
1M
-6.09%
YTD
0.59%
6M
2.13%
1Y
-4.00%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
18.57%
10Y*
-0.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PST vs. TTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
4.69%-4.42%12.27%3.17%38.55%4.01%-18.67%-11.03%1.72%-4.52%
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
0.59%-7.89%38.07%-11.25%150.17%2.55%-54.12%-34.88%6.34%-25.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PST and TTT is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2012

0.91

The correlation between PST and TTT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PST vs. TTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PST
PST Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PST Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PST Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PST Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

TTT
TTT Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
TTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTT Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
TTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTT Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PST vs. TTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSTTTTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.00

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.45

-0.18

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

-0.34

+1.14

PST vs. TTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PST Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the TTT Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PST and TTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PST vs. TTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, smaller than the maximum TTT drawdown of -94.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and TTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTTTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-94.00%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.90%

-22.18%

+15.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-49.69%

+33.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-49.69%

+33.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-81.76%

+45.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.08%

-78.91%

+14.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-70.37%

+8.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

11.89%

-8.06%

Volatility

PST vs. TTT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) is 2.73%, while UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury (TTT) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that PST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTTTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.73%

6.36%

-3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

19.77%

-12.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.49%

28.33%

-18.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

47.02%

-31.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.30%

43.32%

-30.02%

PST vs. TTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PST and TTT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

PST vs. TTT - Dividend Comparison

PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than TTT's 9.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
3.08%3.47%3.61%3.69%0.02%0.00%0.11%1.85%0.66%
TTT
UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury
9.61%9.87%4.86%12.15%0.34%0.00%0.29%1.88%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PST and TTT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTT has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to PST (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs TTT's -94.00%.

On 10-year performance, PST leads with 2.73% vs -0.85% for TTT. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, PST has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PST has performed better with a 2.73% return vs -0.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PST and TTT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

TTT has the higher dividend yield at 9.61%, compared with 3.08% for PST.

PST is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while TTT is Leveraged Bonds. PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while TTT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (-300%).

PST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PST and TTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer