PST vs. TSYW
PST (ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury) and TSYW (Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PST is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while TSYW is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Roundhill. PST is passively managed, while TSYW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. PST charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYW.
Performance
PST vs. TSYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than TSYW's -1.07% return.
PST
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 3.06%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 9.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.73%
TSYW
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PST vs. TSYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 4.69% | 1.74% |
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | -1.07% | -3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PST and TSYW is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | -0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PST vs. TSYW — Risk / Return Rank
PST
TSYW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PST vs. TSYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF (TSYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PST | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PST vs. TSYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than TSYW's maximum drawdown of -9.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and TSYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PST | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.25% | -9.79% | -69.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.08% | -5.48% | -58.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.48% | -4.18% | -57.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | — | — |
Volatility
PST vs. TSYW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PST | TSYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.49% | 10.73% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.59% | 10.73% | +4.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.30% | 10.73% | +2.57% |
PST vs. TSYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSYW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
PST vs. TSYW - Dividend Comparison
PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than TSYW's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.08% | 3.47% | 3.61% | 3.69% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.85% | 0.66% |
TSYW Roundhill Treasury Bond WeeklyPay ETF | 8.18% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PST and TSYW have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PST is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PST is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for TSYW.
TSYW has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 3.08% for PST.
PST is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while TSYW is Leveraged Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PST and 0.99% for TSYW.
Find the right allocation for PST and TSYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer