PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PST vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PST vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PST has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 2.47%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


PST

1D
0.51%
1M
0.80%
YTD
4.57%
6M
6.73%
1Y
1.08%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
2.47%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PST vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
4.57%-4.42%12.27%3.17%38.55%4.01%-18.67%-11.03%1.72%-4.52%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PST and TQQQ is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.19

The correlation between PST and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PST vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PST
TQQQ

Financial Services

69.6%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

4.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Financial Services

PST
69.6%
TQQQ
0.2%

Basic Materials

PST

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Communication Services

PST

-

TQQQ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PST

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

PST

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

PST

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Healthcare

PST

-

TQQQ
4.2%

Industrials

PST

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

PST

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

PST

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

PST

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PST vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PST
PST Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PST Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PST vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSTTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.40

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

3.75

-3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.26

12.27

-12.01

PST vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PST Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PST and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSTTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

2.92

-2.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.43

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.69

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.74

-1.11

Drawdowns

PST vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-81.66%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.25%

-36.97%

+29.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-58.04%

+41.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-81.66%

+65.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-81.66%

+45.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.13%

-0.76%

-63.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-18.52%

-42.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

11.28%

-7.12%

Volatility

PST vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) is 3.19%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that PST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

13.29%

-10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

36.04%

-29.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

47.60%

-37.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

66.53%

-50.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

65.96%

-52.64%

PST vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PST and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

PST vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
3.08%3.47%3.61%3.69%0.02%0.00%0.11%1.85%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PST and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to PST (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 45.33% vs 2.47% for PST. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, PST has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 45.33% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PST and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

PST has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

PST is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%).

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PST and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer