PST vs. SJB
PST (ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury) and SJB (ProShares Short High Yield) are both Inverse Bonds funds from ProShares - PST tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index while SJB tracks the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PST returned 2.47%/yr vs -3.85%/yr for SJB. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
PST vs. SJB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than SJB's 0.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PST has outperformed SJB with an annualized return of 2.47%, while SJB has yielded a comparatively lower -3.85% annualized return.
PST
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 4.57%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 1.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.59%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
SJB
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -0.20%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- -0.44%
- 3Y*
- -1.91%
- 5Y*
- -0.54%
- 10Y*
- -3.85%
PST vs. SJB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 4.57% | -4.42% | 12.27% | 3.17% | 38.55% | 4.01% | -18.67% | -11.03% | 1.72% | -4.52% |
SJB ProShares Short High Yield | 0.67% | -1.87% | -0.84% | -5.63% | 9.57% | -6.69% | -9.23% | -11.42% | 2.47% | -6.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PST and SJB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2011 | 0.00 |
Over the past year, PST and SJB have become more correlated (0.51) than their long-term average of 0.00, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PST vs. SJB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PST
SJB
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PST
SJB
Basic Materials
PST
-
SJB
-
Communication Services
PST
-
SJB
-
Consumer Cyclical
PST
-
SJB
-
Consumer Defensive
PST
-
SJB
-
Energy
PST
-
SJB
-
Healthcare
PST
-
SJB
-
Industrials
PST
-
SJB
-
Real Estate
PST
-
SJB
-
Technology
PST
-
SJB
-
Utilities
PST
-
SJB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PST vs. SJB — Risk / Return Rank
PST
SJB
PST vs. SJB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and ProShares Short High Yield (SJB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PST | SJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 0.98 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | -0.16 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | -0.31 | +0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PST | SJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 | -0.12 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | -0.07 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | -0.45 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | -0.60 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
PST vs. SJB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than SJB's maximum drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and SJB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PST | SJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.25% | -58.06% | -21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.25% | -2.74% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.19% | -10.54% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -13.30% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | -34.57% | -1.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.13% | -57.42% | -6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.48% | -42.47% | -19.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 1.44% | +2.72% |
Volatility
PST vs. SJB - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to ProShares Short High Yield (SJB) at 1.23%. This indicates that PST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PST | SJB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 1.23% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.75% | 2.95% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.62% | 3.83% | +5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 7.51% | +8.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 8.52% | +4.80% |
PST vs. SJB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PST and SJB have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
PST vs. SJB - Dividend Comparison
PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than SJB's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 3.08% | 3.47% | 3.61% | 3.69% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.85% | 0.66% |
SJB ProShares Short High Yield | 3.44% | 3.86% | 5.86% | 4.10% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 1.27% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PST and SJB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PST has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to SJB (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs SJB's -58.06%.
On 10-year performance, PST leads with 2.47% vs -3.85% for SJB. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, SJB has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PST has performed better with a 2.47% return vs -3.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PST and SJB have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 3.08% for PST.
PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while SJB tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index (-100%).
PST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PST and SJB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer