PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PST vs. ISTB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PST vs. ISTB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 4.57% return, which is significantly higher than ISTB's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PST has outperformed ISTB with an annualized return of 2.47%, while ISTB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


PST

1D
0.51%
1M
0.80%
YTD
4.57%
6M
6.73%
1Y
1.08%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
2.47%

ISTB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PST vs. ISTB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
4.57%-4.42%12.27%3.17%38.55%4.01%-18.67%-11.03%1.72%-4.52%
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.49%6.36%4.37%5.56%-6.08%-0.71%4.75%5.61%1.02%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PST and ISTB is -0.92, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

-0.69

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PST and ISTB has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.69 to -0.92, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

PST vs. ISTB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PST
ISTB

Financial Services

69.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

99.4%

Financial Services

PST
69.6%
ISTB

-

Basic Materials

PST

-

ISTB

-

Communication Services

PST

-

ISTB

-

Consumer Cyclical

PST

-

ISTB

-

Consumer Defensive

PST

-

ISTB

-

Energy

PST

-

ISTB

-

Healthcare

PST

-

ISTB

-

Industrials

PST

-

ISTB

-

Real Estate

PST

-

ISTB
0.6%

Technology

PST

-

ISTB

-

Utilities

PST

-

ISTB
99.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PST vs. ISTB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PST
PST Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
PST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
PST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
PST Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
PST Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PST vs. ISTB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSTISTBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.46

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

3.34

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.26

12.72

-12.46

PST vs. ISTB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PST Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is lower than the ISTB Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PST and ISTB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSTISTBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

2.37

-2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.67

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.91

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.37

0.84

-1.21

Drawdowns

PST vs. ISTB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than ISTB's maximum drawdown of -9.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and ISTB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTISTBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.25%

-9.34%

-69.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.25%

-1.26%

-5.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.19%

-1.36%

-14.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.19%

-9.34%

-6.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.07%

-9.34%

-26.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.13%

-0.42%

-63.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.48%

-1.22%

-60.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

0.33%

+3.83%

Volatility

PST vs. ISTB - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) at 0.54%. This indicates that PST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISTB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTISTBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

0.54%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

1.28%

+5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.62%

1.77%

+7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

2.79%

+12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

2.51%

+10.81%

PST vs. ISTB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ISTB's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

PST vs. ISTB - Dividend Comparison

PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than ISTB's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.25%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%
PST
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury
3.08%3.47%3.61%3.69%0.02%0.00%0.11%1.85%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PST and ISTB have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PST has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to ISTB (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs ISTB's -9.34%.

On 10-year performance, PST leads with 2.47% vs 2.27% for ISTB. On fees, ISTB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PST has performed better with a 2.47% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISTB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PST.

ISTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 3.08% for PST.

PST is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while ISTB is Short-Term Bond. PST tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PST and 0.06% for ISTB.

ISTB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PST and ISTB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer