PST vs. PULS
PST (ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury) and PULS (PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PST is a Inverse Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, while PULS is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PGIM. PST is passively managed, while PULS is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PST returned 11.21%/yr vs 4.24%/yr for PULS. Their -0.26 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PST charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for PULS.
Performance
PST vs. PULS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PST achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than PULS's 2.40% return.
PST
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- 6M
- 6.03%
- YTD
- 7.47%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 4.54%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 3.04%
- ALL TIME*
- -4.98%
PULS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $123.16K | $147.97K | $189.80K | |
| $152.36M | $124.89M | $128.03M |
PST vs. PULS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 7.47% | -4.42% | 12.27% | 3.17% | 38.55% | 4.01% | -18.67% | -11.03% | -3.10% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 2.40% | 4.97% | 6.12% | 6.26% | 1.52% | 0.48% | 1.47% | 2.97% | 1.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between PST and PULS is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018 | -0.26 |
The correlation between PST and PULS shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (3 years) to -0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PST vs. PULS — Risk / Return Rank
PST
PULS
PST vs. PULS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PST | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 6.16 | -5.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 49.30 | -47.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.32 | 278.52 | -275.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PST vs. PULS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PST drawdown since its inception was -79.25%, which is greater than PULS's maximum drawdown of -5.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PST and PULS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PST | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.25% | -5.85% | -73.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.73% | -0.09% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.19% | -0.34% | -15.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.19% | -0.79% | -15.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -63.13% | 0.00% | -63.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.49% | -0.09% | -61.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 0.02% | +2.29% |
Volatility
PST vs. PULS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury (PST) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF (PULS) at 0.10%. This indicates that PST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PULS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PST | PULS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 0.10% | +2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 0.32% | +7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.14% | 0.42% | +8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 0.70% | +14.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 1.32% | +11.97% |
PST vs. PULS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PST has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PULS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PST vs. PULS - Dividend Comparison
PST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than PULS's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PST ProShares UltraShort 7-10 Year Treasury | 2.79% | 3.47% | 3.61% | 3.69% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.85% | 0.66% |
PULS PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.47% | 4.78% | 5.62% | 5.48% | 2.30% | 1.19% | 1.85% | 2.69% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PST and PULS have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PST has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to PULS (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PST dropped -79.25% vs PULS's -5.85%.
On 5-year performance, PST leads with 11.21% vs 4.24% for PULS. On fees, PULS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PULS has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PST has performed better with a 11.21% return vs 4.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PULS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PST.
PULS has the higher dividend yield at 4.47%, compared with 2.79% for PST.
PST is categorized as Inverse Bonds, while PULS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PST and 0.15% for PULS.
PULS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.60 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PST and PULS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer