PSRW.L vs. VALW.L
PSRW.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF) and VALW.L (SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, from Invesco and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSRW.L returned 13.56%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for VALW.L. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSRW.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for VALW.L.
Performance
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PSRW.L is traded in GBp, while VALW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VALW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than VALW.L's 19.31% return.
PSRW.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 37.59%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.15%
VALW.L
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 47.31%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 14.58%
- 10Y*
- —
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRW.L Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF | 15.60% | 19.97% | 12.95% | 10.09% | 2.42% | 22.39% | 11.42% |
VALW.L SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF | 19.31% | 27.01% | 5.92% | 16.43% | 0.09% | 20.68% | -18.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSRW.L and VALW.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PSRW.L and VALW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Financial Services
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Industrials
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Energy
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Healthcare
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Consumer Cyclical
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Communication Services
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Basic Materials
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Consumer Defensive
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Utilities
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Real Estate
PSRW.L
VALW.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L — Risk / Return Rank
PSRW.L
VALW.L
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSRW.L | VALW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.92 | 3.95 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.20 | 5.39 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.74 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 6.69 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.48 | 25.10 | -3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSRW.L | VALW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.92 | 3.95 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.11 | 1.15 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.68 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, which is greater than VALW.L's maximum drawdown of -28.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and VALW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSRW.L | VALW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -28.59% | -21.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -7.04% | +0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.23% | -14.24% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -14.24% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -4.55% | +0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.88% | -0.17% |
Volatility
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF (VALW.L) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSRW.L | VALW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 4.18% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.15% | 9.58% | -2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.55% | 11.93% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 12.65% | -0.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 16.68% | -2.28% |
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VALW.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSRW.L vs. VALW.L - Dividend Comparison
PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while VALW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRW.L Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF | 1.74% | 2.00% | 2.29% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 1.96% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 1.93% | 2.00% |
VALW.L SPDR MSCI World Value UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSRW.L and VALW.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VALW.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VALW.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRW.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.25% for VALW.L.
Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and VALW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer