PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSRW.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L returned 13.16%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSRW.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.

Performance

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 13.16%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.

PSRW.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.77%
YTD
15.72%
6M
17.26%
1Y
36.84%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
13.16%

SPXP.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
5.93%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.27%
3Y*
19.50%
5Y*
15.15%
10Y*
16.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF		15.72%19.97%12.95%10.09%2.42%22.39%2.67%17.83%-7.86%9.35%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF		10.55%9.53%27.58%20.06%-8.79%31.26%13.90%26.76%0.26%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and SPXP.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014

0.72

The correlation between PSRW.L and SPXP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
PSRW.L
SPXP.L

Technology

19.1%
35.6%

Financial Services

18.8%
11.8%

Industrials

9.8%
8.3%

Energy

9.5%
3.5%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.1%

Communication Services

7.5%
11.2%

Basic Materials

6.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.9%

Utilities

3.6%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

PSRW.L
19.1%
SPXP.L
35.6%

Financial Services

PSRW.L
18.8%
SPXP.L
11.8%

Industrials

PSRW.L
9.8%
SPXP.L
8.3%

Energy

PSRW.L
9.5%
SPXP.L
3.5%

Healthcare

PSRW.L
9.0%
SPXP.L
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSRW.L
8.5%
SPXP.L
10.1%

Communication Services

PSRW.L
7.5%
SPXP.L
11.2%

Basic Materials

PSRW.L
6.7%
SPXP.L
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

PSRW.L
5.7%
SPXP.L
4.9%

Utilities

PSRW.L
3.6%
SPXP.L
2.4%

Real Estate

PSRW.L
1.8%
SPXP.L
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF

Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF

Often compared with PSRW.L:
PSRW.L vs. ACWIPSRW.L vs. VWRL.LPSRW.L vs. LDCU.LPSRW.L vs. EXUS.LPSRW.L vs. XDEQ.LPSRW.L vs. VTPSRW.L vs. IQDG
Often compared with SPXP.L:
SPXP.L vs. VUAG.LSPXP.L vs. CSPX.LSPXP.L vs. SPXSSPXP.L vs. VOOSPXP.L vs. SPX5.LSPXP.L vs. SMT.LSPXP.L vs. SPXD.L

Return for Risk

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PSRW.L
PSRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
SPXP.L
SPXP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PSRW.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.85

2.78

+1.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.11

3.72

+1.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.52

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

4.11

+1.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.51

15.14

+6.37

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the SPXP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and SPXP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PSRW.LSPXP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

2.78

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

1.06

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

1.10

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.15

-0.57

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and SPXP.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

PSRW.LSPXP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.85%

-25.46%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-7.09%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-20.77%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-20.77%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-25.46%

-3.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-3.50%

-0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.93%

-0.22%

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

PSRW.LSPXP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

2.64%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.24%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

10.56%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

14.23%

-2.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

16.22%

-1.82%

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSRW.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF		1.74%2.00%2.29%2.46%2.58%1.96%1.99%2.45%2.52%2.03%1.93%2.00%
SPXP.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

PSRW.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRW.L.

PSRW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and SPXP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer