PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 34.75% return.


PSRW.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.77%
YTD
15.72%
6M
17.26%
1Y
36.84%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
13.16%

CHRG.L

1D
-1.90%
1M
6.41%
YTD
34.75%
6M
34.20%
1Y
109.23%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
15.72%19.97%12.95%10.09%2.42%22.39%11.34%
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
34.75%44.29%-11.91%-9.67%-19.10%14.89%72.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and CHRG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020

0.63

The correlation between PSRW.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSRW.L
CHRG.L

Technology

19.1%
8.2%

Financial Services

18.8%

-

Industrials

9.8%
48.7%

Energy

9.5%
6.1%

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
15.5%

Communication Services

7.5%

-

Basic Materials

6.7%
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
0.0%

Utilities

3.6%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Technology

PSRW.L
19.1%
CHRG.L
8.2%

Financial Services

PSRW.L
18.8%
CHRG.L

-

Industrials

PSRW.L
9.8%
CHRG.L
48.7%

Energy

PSRW.L
9.5%
CHRG.L
6.1%

Healthcare

PSRW.L
9.0%
CHRG.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSRW.L
8.5%
CHRG.L
15.5%

Communication Services

PSRW.L
7.5%
CHRG.L

-

Basic Materials

PSRW.L
6.7%
CHRG.L
20.3%

Consumer Defensive

PSRW.L
5.7%
CHRG.L
0.0%

Utilities

PSRW.L
3.6%
CHRG.L
1.3%

Real Estate

PSRW.L
1.8%
CHRG.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRW.L
PSRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSRW.LCHRG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.85

2.08

+1.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.11

2.86

+2.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.55

+0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

3.66

+1.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.51

6.77

+14.74

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSRW.LCHRG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

2.08

+1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.20

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.53

+0.05

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and CHRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSRW.LCHRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.85%

-52.64%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-29.68%

+23.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-39.46%

+25.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-52.64%

+38.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.67%

+2.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-22.35%

+18.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

16.07%

-14.36%

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSRW.LCHRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

10.38%

-7.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

19.04%

-11.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

52.32%

-42.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

30.08%

-17.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

29.55%

-15.15%

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.74%2.00%2.29%2.46%2.58%1.96%1.99%2.45%2.52%2.03%1.93%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSRW.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSRW.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSRW.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.

PSRW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and CHRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer