PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L
PSRW.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF) and CHRG.L (WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CHRG.L is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSRW.L returned 13.56%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for CHRG.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSRW.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CHRG.L.
Performance
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 34.75% return.
PSRW.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
CHRG.L
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- 6.41%
- YTD
- 34.75%
- 6M
- 34.20%
- 1Y
- 109.23%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRW.L Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF | 15.72% | 19.97% | 12.95% | 10.09% | 2.42% | 22.39% | 11.34% |
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 34.75% | 44.29% | -11.91% | -9.67% | -19.10% | 14.89% | 72.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSRW.L and CHRG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2020 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PSRW.L and CHRG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Financial Services
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
-
Industrials
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Energy
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Healthcare
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Communication Services
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
-
Basic Materials
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Consumer Defensive
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Utilities
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
Real Estate
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank
PSRW.L
CHRG.L
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSRW.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.85 | 2.08 | +1.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.11 | 2.86 | +2.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.55 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 3.66 | +1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.51 | 6.77 | +14.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSRW.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85 | 2.08 | +1.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.20 | +0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.53 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and CHRG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSRW.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -52.64% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -29.68% | +23.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.23% | -39.46% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -52.64% | +38.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.67% | +2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -22.35% | +18.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 16.07% | -14.36% |
Volatility
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 10.38%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSRW.L | CHRG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 10.38% | -7.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 19.04% | -11.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 52.32% | -42.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 30.08% | -17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 29.55% | -15.15% |
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSRW.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison
PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while CHRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHRG.L WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSRW.L Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF | 1.74% | 2.00% | 2.29% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 1.96% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 1.93% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSRW.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSRW.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSRW.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CHRG.L.
PSRW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CHRG.L is Alternative Energy Equities. PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.
Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and CHRG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer