PSR vs. URE
PSR (Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund) and URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) are both REIT funds. PSR is actively managed, while URE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSR returned 5.88%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for URE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for URE.
Performance
PSR vs. URE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSR achieves a 16.36% return, which is significantly lower than URE's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PSR has outperformed URE with an annualized return of 5.88%, while URE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.29% annualized return.
PSR
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 16.36%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 14.68%
- 3Y*
- 11.12%
- 5Y*
- 2.80%
- 10Y*
- 5.88%
URE
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 21.30%
- 6M
- 22.37%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- -2.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.29%
PSR vs. URE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSR Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 16.36% | 2.63% | 1.79% | 8.34% | -25.52% | 41.71% | -6.04% | 28.76% | -4.58% | 11.95% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 21.30% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSR and URE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2008 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PSR and URE shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.98 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSR vs. URE — Risk / Return Rank
PSR
URE
PSR vs. URE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (PSR) and ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSR | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 0.68 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.53 | 1.63 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSR vs. URE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSR drawdown since its inception was -42.31%, smaller than the maximum URE drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSR and URE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSR | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.31% | -97.16% | +54.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -16.50% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.58% | -33.77% | +17.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.81% | -63.66% | +28.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.31% | -70.49% | +28.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -49.63% | +47.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -64.47% | +55.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.66% | 6.86% | -4.20% |
Volatility
PSR vs. URE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund (PSR) is 5.32%, while ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that PSR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSR | URE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 10.65% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 21.26% | -10.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 28.21% | -14.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 37.44% | -18.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.36% | 40.64% | -20.28% |
PSR vs. URE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than URE's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSR vs. URE - Dividend Comparison
PSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than URE's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSR Invesco Active U.S. Real Estate Fund | 2.54% | 2.56% | 3.06% | 2.93% | 2.95% | 2.12% | 3.09% | 2.55% | 2.64% | 0.14% | 3.60% | 3.20% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 1.93% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PSR and URE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
URE has higher volatility (10.65%) compared to PSR (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSR dropped -42.31% vs URE's -97.16%.
On 10-year performance, PSR leads with 5.88% vs 3.29% for URE. On fees, PSR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PSR has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PSR has performed better with a 5.88% return vs 3.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
PSR has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.93% for URE.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PSR and 0.95% for URE.
PSR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSR and URE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer