PSQO vs. GSG
PSQO (Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQO is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Palmer Square, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. PSQO is actively managed, while GSG is passively managed. Over the past year, PSQO returned 5.72% vs 51.52% for GSG. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. PSQO charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
PSQO vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.
PSQO
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 5.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
PSQO vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 1.63% | 7.05% | 1.96% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 42.58% | 5.93% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQO and GSG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | -0.12 |
The correlation between PSQO and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQO vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
PSQO
GSG
PSQO vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSQO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.40 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.69 | 5.47 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 35.71 | 14.39 | +21.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSQO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71 | 2.26 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.13 | -0.09 | +3.21 |
Drawdowns
PSQO vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQO and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -89.62% | +88.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.66% | -9.46% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -56.95% | +56.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -63.71% | +63.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | 3.59% | -3.43% |
Volatility
PSQO vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) is 0.57%, while iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that PSQO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQO | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 7.65% | -7.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.27% | 20.42% | -19.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55% | 22.95% | -21.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 22.61% | -20.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 22.03% | -20.03% |
PSQO vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQO vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
PSQO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 4.13% | 4.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQO and GSG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GSG has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to PSQO (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQO dropped -0.76% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 1-year performance, GSG leads with 51.52% vs 5.72% for PSQO. On fees, PSQO is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, PSQO has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GSG has performed better with a 51.52% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSQO is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
PSQO has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
PSQO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while GSG is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Palmer Square and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PSQO and 0.75% for GSG.
PSQO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQO and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer