PSQO vs. COMB

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PSQO (Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF) and COMB (GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQO is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Palmer Square, while COMB is a Commodities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSQO returned 5.54% vs 25.91% for COMB. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. PSQO charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for COMB.

Performance

PSQO vs. COMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQO achieves a 2.22% return, which is significantly lower than COMB's 17.53% return.

PSQO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 2.17%
• YTD: 2.22%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMB

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 14.82%
• YTD: 17.53%
• 1Y: 25.91%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQO vs. COMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF	2.22%	7.05%	1.96%
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	17.53%	15.12%	6.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQO and COMB is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2024	-0.10

Return for Risk

PSQO vs. COMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQO

PSQO Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSQO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSQO Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PSQO Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PSQO Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
PSQO Martin Ratio Rank: 97

COMB

COMB Risk / Return Rank: 52
COMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
COMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
COMB Omega Ratio Rank: 57
COMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
COMB Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQO vs. COMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) and GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSQO	COMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.49	1.56	+1.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.06	2.09	+3.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.79	1.28	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.57	1.82	+6.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	34.54	6.14	+28.40

PSQO vs. COMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQO Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the COMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQO and COMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSQO vs. COMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum COMB drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQO and COMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSQO	COMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.76%	-33.50%	+32.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.66%	-14.84%	+14.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-11.35%	+11.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.11%	-12.05%	+11.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.16%	4.40%	-4.24%

Volatility

PSQO vs. COMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) is 0.59%, while GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF (COMB) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that PSQO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSQO	COMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	4.24%	-3.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.29%	15.09%	-13.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62%	17.38%	-15.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.99%	16.69%	-14.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.99%	15.15%	-13.16%

PSQO vs. COMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than COMB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSQO vs. COMB - Dividend Comparison

PSQO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, less than COMB's 7.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COMB GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF	7.70%	9.05%	2.48%	6.57%	30.85%	15.83%	0.07%	1.48%	0.97%	0.20%
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF	4.53%	4.45%	1.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSQO and COMB in my portfolio?

PSQO and COMB have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSQO or COMB?

COMB has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to PSQO (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQO dropped -0.76% vs COMB's -33.50%.

Which ETF is better, PSQO or COMB?

On 1-year performance, COMB leads with 25.91% vs 5.54% for PSQO. On fees, COMB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PSQO has been the lower-risk option at 0.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSQO or COMB?

Over the 1-year period, COMB has performed better with a 25.91% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSQO or COMB?

COMB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for PSQO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSQO or COMB?

COMB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 4.53% for PSQO.

What is the main difference between PSQO and COMB?

PSQO is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while COMB is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Palmer Square and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PSQO and 0.25% for COMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSQO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.