PSQGX vs. GRSPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PSQGX (Port Street Quality Growth Fund) and GRSPX (Greenspring Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, PSQGX returned 7.75%/yr vs 10.28%/yr for GRSPX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSQGX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for GRSPX.

Performance

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Port Street Quality Growth Fund (PSQGX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQGX achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than GRSPX's 20.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PSQGX has underperformed GRSPX with an annualized return of 7.75%, while GRSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.

PSQGX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 11.21%
• 3Y*: 8.17%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 7.75%

GRSPX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 20.69%
• 6M: 19.16%
• 1Y: 26.02%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: 10.83%
• 10Y*: 10.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSQGX Port Street Quality Growth Fund	1.87%	10.30%	10.18%	10.72%	-8.68%	13.23%	9.24%	16.66%	-0.68%	15.00%
GRSPX Greenspring Fund	20.69%	6.12%	16.03%	11.95%	-8.62%	26.89%	3.81%	20.84%	-10.21%	7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQGX and GRSPX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2014	0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between PSQGX and GRSPX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PSQGX vs. GRSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQGX

PSQGX Risk / Return Rank: 26
PSQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PSQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PSQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
PSQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PSQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

GRSPX

GRSPX Risk / Return Rank: 24
GRSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
GRSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
GRSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
GRSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GRSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Port Street Quality Growth Fund (PSQGX) and Greenspring Fund (GRSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSQGX	GRSPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	0.52	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	1.26	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.35	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.96	+0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.22	9.04	-4.82

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the GRSPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQGX and GRSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQGX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum GRSPX drawdown of -35.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQGX and GRSPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSQGX	GRSPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.97%	-35.67%	+16.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-30.41%	+22.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.01%	-30.41%	+19.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.52%	-30.41%	+14.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.97%	-35.07%	+16.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-1.24%	-0.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.27%	-4.81%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.52%	3.09%	-0.57%

Volatility

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Port Street Quality Growth Fund (PSQGX) is 2.30%, while Greenspring Fund (GRSPX) has a volatility of 50.71%. This indicates that PSQGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSQGX	GRSPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	50.71%	-48.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.59%	50.92%	-45.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.96%	56.52%	-49.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.63%	28.13%	-18.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.04%	22.51%	-12.47%

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQGX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than GRSPX's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSQGX vs. GRSPX - Dividend Comparison

PSQGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.85%, more than GRSPX's 7.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRSPX Greenspring Fund	7.79%	9.40%	7.14%	6.84%	8.04%	7.69%	2.39%	7.89%	11.05%	9.63%	6.81%	5.34%
PSQGX Port Street Quality Growth Fund	14.85%	15.12%	3.27%	3.88%	2.32%	1.92%	1.88%	1.40%	1.71%	0.53%	0.61%	0.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSQGX and GRSPX in my portfolio?

PSQGX and GRSPX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSQGX or GRSPX?

GRSPX has higher volatility (50.71%) compared to PSQGX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQGX dropped -18.97% vs GRSPX's -35.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.