PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSPCX vs. PSLDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C (PSPCX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSPCX achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than PSLDX's 10.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSPCX having a 14.35% annualized return and PSLDX not far ahead at 14.66%.


PSPCX

1D
0.10%
1M
5.77%
YTD
11.39%
6M
2.98%
1Y
18.68%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
9.99%
10Y*
14.35%

PSLDX

1D
0.32%
1M
7.19%
YTD
10.35%
6M
9.08%
1Y
33.67%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
14.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSPCX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C
11.39%7.00%22.72%24.17%-21.92%26.86%17.29%47.57%-6.34%21.34%
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
10.35%20.34%15.41%27.93%-43.18%25.85%37.80%60.43%-9.31%33.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PSPCX and PSLDX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.78

The correlation between PSPCX and PSLDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSPCX vs. PSLDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSPCX
PSPCX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PSPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PSPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLDX
PSLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PSLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C (PSPCX) and PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSPCXPSLDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.53

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

10.23

-6.57

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSPCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the PSLDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSPCX and PSLDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSPCXPSLDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

2.12

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.27

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.69

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.67

-0.22

Drawdowns

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSPCX drawdown since its inception was -63.07%, which is greater than PSLDX's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSPCX and PSLDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSPCXPSLDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.07%

-55.25%

-7.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.74%

-13.70%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.40%

-24.03%

+3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.83%

-49.32%

+21.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.46%

-49.32%

+12.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.96%

-10.65%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.34%

3.38%

+1.96%

Volatility

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C (PSPCX) is 2.74%, while PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that PSPCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSPCXPSLDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

5.37%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

13.18%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

16.34%

-1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

22.71%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.91%

21.32%

-2.41%

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSPCX has a 1.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSPCX vs. PSLDX - Dividend Comparison

PSPCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.23%, more than PSLDX's 9.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
9.43%12.92%15.23%3.67%2.66%38.80%12.89%18.91%15.58%24.52%11.55%12.08%
PSPCX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Fund Class C
16.23%16.57%14.61%2.25%11.36%16.99%4.05%27.22%23.19%0.76%0.40%11.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSPCX and PSLDX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLDX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to PSPCX (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSPCX dropped -63.07% vs PSLDX's -55.25%.

PSLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSPCX and PSLDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer