PSP vs. SOXQ
PSP (Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and SOXQ (Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSP is a Global Equities fund tracking the Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SOXQ is a Semiconductors fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSP returned 10.19%/yr vs 59.40%/yr for SOXQ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSP charges 1.44%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOXQ.
Performance
PSP vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSP achieves a -13.50% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 96.72% return.
PSP
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- -13.50%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- -7.74%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.12%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 32.12%
- YTD
- 96.72%
- 6M
- 91.61%
- 1Y
- 181.76%
- 3Y*
- 59.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSP vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -13.50% | 6.49% | 17.42% | 37.72% | -37.37% | 5.87% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 96.72% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSP and SOXQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2021 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PSP and SOXQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSP vs. SOXQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSP
SOXQ
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PSP
SOXQ
Consumer Defensive
PSP
SOXQ
-
Industrials
PSP
SOXQ
-
Communication Services
PSP
SOXQ
-
Healthcare
PSP
SOXQ
-
Basic Materials
PSP
SOXQ
-
Technology
PSP
SOXQ
Consumer Cyclical
PSP
-
SOXQ
-
Energy
PSP
-
SOXQ
-
Real Estate
PSP
-
SOXQ
-
Utilities
PSP
-
SOXQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSP vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
PSP
SOXQ
PSP vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.72 | -0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 11.73 | -12.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.80 | 45.01 | -45.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.39 | 5.43 | -5.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.98 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
PSP vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSP drawdown since its inception was -85.40%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSP and SOXQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.40% | -46.01% | -39.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.37% | -15.59% | -6.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.94% | -39.36% | +16.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.72% | 0.00% | -17.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.69% | -12.96% | -17.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.67% | 4.06% | +5.61% |
Volatility
PSP vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) is 6.89%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 13.44%. This indicates that PSP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSP | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.89% | 13.44% | -6.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.20% | 26.70% | -10.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 33.78% | -13.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 36.38% | -12.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 36.38% | -13.93% |
PSP vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSP has a 1.44% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSP vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
PSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.68%, more than SOXQ's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSP Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 6.68% | 5.87% | 8.62% | 3.96% | 2.88% | 10.34% | 4.66% | 5.87% | 6.81% | 10.18% | 4.12% | 6.23% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.26% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSP and SOXQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXQ has higher volatility (13.44%) compared to PSP (6.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSP dropped -85.40% vs SOXQ's -46.01%.
On 3-year performance, SOXQ leads with 59.40% vs 10.19% for PSP. On fees, SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PSP has been the lower-risk option at 6.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SOXQ has performed better with a 59.40% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXQ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.44% for PSP.
PSP has the higher dividend yield at 6.68%, compared with 0.26% for SOXQ.
PSP is categorized as Global Equities, while SOXQ is Semiconductors. PSP tracks Red Rocks Global Listed Private Equity Index, while SOXQ tracks PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 1.44% for PSP and 0.19% for SOXQ.
SOXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSP and SOXQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer