PSMR vs. PTLC
PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. PSMR is actively managed, while PTLC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSMR returned 8.52%/yr vs 10.72%/yr for PTLC. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.
Performance
PSMR vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 5.53% return.
PSMR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 21.41%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.26%
PSMR vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.68% | 6.74% | 11.99% | 16.85% | -4.11% | 7.37% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 5.53% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 19.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMR and PTLC is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PSMR and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSMR vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMR
PTLC
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMR
PTLC
Financial Services
PSMR
PTLC
Communication Services
PSMR
PTLC
Consumer Cyclical
PSMR
PTLC
Healthcare
PSMR
PTLC
Industrials
PSMR
PTLC
Consumer Defensive
PSMR
PTLC
Energy
PSMR
PTLC
Utilities
PSMR
PTLC
Real Estate
PSMR
PTLC
Basic Materials
PSMR
PTLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMR vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
PSMR
PTLC
PSMR vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.96 | 1.34 | +0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.03 | 2.45 | +12.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.58 | 9.71 | +63.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | 1.91 | +2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.92 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.70 | +0.35 |
Drawdowns
PSMR vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -26.63% | +14.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -8.77% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -15.17% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -15.17% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.74% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -5.64% | +3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 2.21% | -2.01% |
Volatility
PSMR vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.71%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 2.88% | -2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 8.15% | -5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 11.27% | -7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 11.73% | -3.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 13.17% | -4.76% |
PSMR vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMR vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
PSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMR and PTLC have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMR.
PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSMR.
PSMR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.60% for PTLC.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMR and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer