PSMR vs. OCTW
PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and OCTW (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. PSMR is actively managed, while OCTW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSMR returned 8.52%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for OCTW. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for OCTW.
Performance
PSMR vs. OCTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than OCTW's 4.65% return.
PSMR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
OCTW
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 4.65%
- 6M
- 5.17%
- 1Y
- 12.50%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR vs. OCTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.68% | 6.74% | 11.99% | 16.85% | -4.11% | 7.37% |
OCTW AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF | 4.65% | 9.68% | 8.67% | 17.57% | 0.54% | 4.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMR and OCTW is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.80 |
The correlation between PSMR and OCTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSMR vs. OCTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMR
OCTW
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMR
OCTW
Financial Services
PSMR
OCTW
Communication Services
PSMR
OCTW
Consumer Cyclical
PSMR
OCTW
Healthcare
PSMR
OCTW
Industrials
PSMR
OCTW
Consumer Defensive
PSMR
OCTW
Energy
PSMR
OCTW
Utilities
PSMR
OCTW
Real Estate
PSMR
OCTW
Basic Materials
PSMR
OCTW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMR vs. OCTW — Risk / Return Rank
PSMR
OCTW
PSMR vs. OCTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMR | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.96 | 1.53 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.03 | 3.43 | +11.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.58 | 17.68 | +55.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMR | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | 2.56 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 1.48 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
PSMR vs. OCTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than OCTW's maximum drawdown of -8.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and OCTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMR | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -8.38% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -3.65% | +2.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -8.38% | -3.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -8.38% | -3.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.11% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -0.82% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 0.71% | -0.51% |
Volatility
PSMR vs. OCTW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Oct ETF (OCTW) have volatilities of 0.71% and 0.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMR | OCTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 0.73% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 3.81% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 4.92% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 6.29% | +2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 6.14% | +2.27% |
PSMR vs. OCTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTW's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMR vs. OCTW - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSMR nor OCTW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMR and OCTW have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OCTW has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs OCTW's -8.38%.
On 5-year performance, OCTW leads with 8.85% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OCTW has performed better with a 8.85% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for OCTW.
PSMR and OCTW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.74% for OCTW.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMR and OCTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer