PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMR vs. KAUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSMR vs. KAUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than KAUG's 7.32% return.


PSMR

1D
0.15%
1M
1.38%
YTD
7.84%
6M
8.66%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
11.89%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*

KAUG

1D
0.23%
1M
1.19%
YTD
7.32%
6M
7.40%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMR vs. KAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PSMR
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF
7.84%6.74%6.16%
KAUG
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF
7.32%5.52%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMR and KAUG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024

0.71

The correlation between PSMR and KAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSMR vs. KAUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMR
PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

KAUG
KAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
KAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
KAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
KAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
KAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMR vs. KAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMRKAUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

1.38

+0.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.23

4.08

+11.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

74.72

14.77

+59.95

PSMR vs. KAUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMR Sharpe Ratio is 4.28, which is higher than the KAUG Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMR and KAUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMRKAUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28

2.01

+2.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.77

+0.28

Drawdowns

PSMR vs. KAUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum KAUG drawdown of -15.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and KAUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMRKAUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.78%

-15.66%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.99%

-3.94%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

0.00%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-2.84%

+1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

1.09%

-0.89%

Volatility

PSMR vs. KAUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.68%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSMRKAUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.68%

0.95%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.46%

5.15%

-2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.53%

8.01%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.48%

11.20%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

11.20%

-2.79%

PSMR vs. KAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than KAUG's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSMR vs. KAUG - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMR nor KAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PSMR and KAUG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KAUG has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to PSMR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs KAUG's -15.66%.

On 1-year performance, KAUG leads with 16.01% vs 15.03% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KAUG has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAUG.

PSMR and KAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.79% for KAUG.

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSMR and KAUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer