PSMR vs. KAUG
PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and KAUG (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSMR returned 15.03% vs 16.01% for KAUG. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KAUG.
Performance
PSMR vs. KAUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than KAUG's 7.32% return.
PSMR
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 15.03%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- —
KAUG
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 7.32%
- 6M
- 7.40%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR vs. KAUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.84% | 6.74% | 6.16% |
KAUG Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF | 7.32% | 5.52% | 2.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMR and KAUG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PSMR and KAUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMR vs. KAUG — Risk / Return Rank
PSMR
KAUG
PSMR vs. KAUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMR | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.97 | 1.38 | +0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.23 | 4.08 | +11.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 74.72 | 14.77 | +59.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMR | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28 | 2.01 | +2.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 0.77 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
PSMR vs. KAUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum KAUG drawdown of -15.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and KAUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMR | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -15.66% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -3.94% | +2.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | 0.00% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.66% | -2.84% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 1.09% | -0.89% |
Volatility
PSMR vs. KAUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.68%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF (KAUG) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KAUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMR | KAUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 0.95% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.46% | 5.15% | -2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 8.01% | -4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 11.20% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 11.20% | -2.79% |
PSMR vs. KAUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than KAUG's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMR vs. KAUG - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSMR nor KAUG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMR and KAUG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KAUG has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to PSMR (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs KAUG's -15.66%.
On 1-year performance, KAUG leads with 16.01% vs 15.03% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KAUG has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KAUG.
PSMR and KAUG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.79% for KAUG.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMR and KAUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer