PSMR vs. FBUF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and FBUF (Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSMR returned 14.83% vs 19.61% for FBUF. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for FBUF.

Performance

PSMR vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 5.32% return.

PSMR

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 8.38%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

FBUF

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.85%
• YTD: 5.32%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 19.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMR vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF	7.68%	6.74%	9.84%
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	5.32%	14.01%	10.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMR and FBUF is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2024	0.80

The correlation between PSMR and FBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSMR vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMR

PSMR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PSMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PSMR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PSMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PSMR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

FBUF

FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 79
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMR vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSMR	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.23	2.63	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.28	3.55	+3.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.96	1.53	+0.43
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.03	3.51	+11.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	73.58	15.68	+57.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSMR vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMR Sharpe Ratio is 4.23, which is higher than the FBUF Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMR and FBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSMR	FBUF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.23	2.63	+1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.47	-0.42

Drawdowns

PSMR vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and FBUF.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMR	FBUF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.78%	-11.09%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.99%	-5.61%	+4.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.15%	-0.22%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-1.38%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	1.25%	-1.05%

Volatility

PSMR vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.71%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMR	FBUF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.71%	1.11%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.48%	5.37%	-2.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	7.49%	-3.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.48%	9.55%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.41%	9.55%	-1.14%

PSMR vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMR vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

PSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF	0.63%	0.64%	0.54%
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMR and FBUF in my portfolio?

PSMR and FBUF have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMR or FBUF?

FBUF has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs FBUF's -11.09%.

Which ETF is better, PSMR or FBUF?

On 1-year performance, FBUF leads with 19.61% vs 14.83% for PSMR. On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMR or FBUF?

Over the 1-year period, FBUF has performed better with a 19.61% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMR or FBUF?

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMR or FBUF?

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for PSMR.

What is the main difference between PSMR and FBUF?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.48% for FBUF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.