PSMO vs. XLRI

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

PSMO (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMO is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSMO returned 12.72% vs 9.61% for XLRI. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PSMO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.

Performance

PSMO vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMO achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 8.24% return.

PSMO

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.60%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 7.47%
• 1Y: 12.72%
• 3Y*: 12.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.25%

XLRI

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.15%
• 6M: 6.94%
• YTD: 8.24%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	$36.16K	$28.15K	$26.49K
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	$73.67K	$70.90K	$65.83K

PSMO vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	7.47%	4.63%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	8.24%	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMO and XLRI is 0.15, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

PSMO vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSMO

PSMO Risk / Return Rank: 81
PSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
PSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 87

XLRI

XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 33
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSMO vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSMO	XLRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	0.88	+1.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	1.24	+1.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.16	+0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	1.36	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.17	4.74	+9.43

PSMO vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the XLRI Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMO and XLRI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSMO vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMO drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMO and XLRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMO	XLRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-7.12%	-2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-7.12%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.81%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.30%	-1.54%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	2.03%	-1.13%

Volatility

PSMO vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) is 1.53%, while State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that PSMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMO	XLRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.53%	3.22%	-1.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.09%	8.71%	-3.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.33%	11.00%	-4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.37%	11.08%	-2.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.37%	11.08%	-2.71%

PSMO vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMO vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

PSMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.33%.

Position	TTM	2025
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	0.00%	0.00%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	14.33%	6.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMO and XLRI in my portfolio?

PSMO and XLRI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMO or XLRI?

XLRI has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to PSMO (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMO dropped -9.77% vs XLRI's -7.12%.

Which ETF is better, PSMO or XLRI?

On 1-year performance, PSMO leads with 12.72% vs 9.61% for XLRI. On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PSMO has been the lower-risk option at 1.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMO or XLRI?

Over the 1-year period, PSMO has performed better with a 12.72% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMO or XLRI?

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMO or XLRI?

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 14.33%, compared with 0.00% for PSMO.

What is the main difference between PSMO and XLRI?

PSMO is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSMO and 0.35% for XLRI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.