PSMO vs. APRW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSMO (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF) and APRW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMO returned 11.84%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for APRW. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for APRW.

Performance

PSMO vs. APRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMO achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 5.94% return.

PSMO

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 4.46%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: 11.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRW

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 5.94%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 11.57%
• 3Y*: 9.84%
• 5Y*: 6.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMO vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	5.01%	11.44%	9.44%	20.50%	-1.32%	2.88%
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF	5.94%	6.18%	11.25%	12.38%	-2.90%	1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMO and APRW is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.78

The correlation between PSMO and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSMO vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMO

PSMO Risk / Return Rank: 78
PSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
PSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 82

APRW

APRW Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
APRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRW Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMO vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSMO	APRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	4.35	-2.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.33	7.57	-4.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	2.07	-0.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.00	13.01	-10.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.09	68.66	-53.57

PSMO vs. APRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the APRW Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMO and APRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSMO vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMO drawdown since its inception was -9.77%, roughly equal to the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMO and APRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMO	APRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.77%	-9.61%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.48%	-0.89%	-3.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.77%	-9.61%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	-0.46%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.32%	-1.11%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.17%	+0.72%

Volatility

PSMO vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF (PSMO) has a higher volatility of 1.62% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) at 1.14%. This indicates that PSMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMO	APRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	1.14%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.70%	2.13%	+2.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.99%	2.71%	+3.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.38%	6.73%	+1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.38%	6.40%	+1.98%

PSMO vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMO vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMO nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.67%
PSMO Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMO and APRW in my portfolio?

PSMO and APRW have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMO or APRW?

PSMO has higher volatility (1.62%) compared to APRW (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMO dropped -9.77% vs APRW's -9.61%.

Which ETF is better, PSMO or APRW?

On 3-year performance, PSMO leads with 11.84% vs 9.84% for APRW. On fees, PSMO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, APRW has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMO or APRW?

Over the 3-year period, PSMO has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 9.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMO or APRW?

PSMO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for APRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMO or APRW?

PSMO and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSMO and APRW?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSMO and 0.74% for APRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.