PSMJ vs. TMAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSMJ (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF) and TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds. PSMJ is actively managed, while TMAR is passively managed. Over the past year, PSMJ returned 14.72% vs 24.40% for TMAR. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TMAR.

Performance

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than TMAR's 12.46% return.

PSMJ

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 6M: 4.73%
• 1Y: 14.72%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMAR

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 24.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF	4.83%	15.05%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	12.46%	15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMJ and TMAR is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.60

The correlation between PSMJ and TMAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSMJ vs. TMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMJ

PSMJ Risk / Return Rank: 91
PSMJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PSMJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PSMJ Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PSMJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PSMJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

TMAR

TMAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
TMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSMJ	TMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	2.25	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	3.19	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.56	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	5.22	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.43	25.73	-3.30

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the TMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMJ and TMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, which is greater than TMAR's maximum drawdown of -9.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and TMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSMJ	TMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.87%	-9.93%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.70%	-4.69%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-2.74%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-0.72%	-0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.66%	0.95%	-0.29%

Volatility

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 0.52%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSMJ	TMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.52%	6.23%	-5.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.84%	9.98%	-6.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.28%	10.91%	-5.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.91%	12.32%	-3.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.91%	12.32%	-3.41%

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSMJ vs. TMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMJ nor TMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSMJ and TMAR in my portfolio?

PSMJ and TMAR have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSMJ or TMAR?

TMAR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to PSMJ (0.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMJ dropped -10.87% vs TMAR's -9.93%.

Which ETF is better, PSMJ or TMAR?

On 1-year performance, TMAR leads with 24.40% vs 14.72% for PSMJ. On fees, PSMJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSMJ or TMAR?

Over the 1-year period, TMAR has performed better with a 24.40% return vs 14.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSMJ or TMAR?

PSMJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSMJ or TMAR?

PSMJ and TMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSMJ and TMAR?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.95% for TMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSMJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.