PSMJ vs. SRVR
PSMJ (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMJ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. PSMJ is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMJ returned 13.98%/yr vs 8.85%/yr for SRVR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.
PSMJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -2.74%
- YTD
- 19.79%
- 6M
- 20.69%
- 1Y
- 11.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.81%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 4.52% | 13.29% | 14.06% | 19.80% | -2.41% | 3.68% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 19.79% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 8.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMJ and SRVR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSMJ and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMJ
SRVR
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMJ
SRVR
Financial Services
PSMJ
SRVR
Communication Services
PSMJ
SRVR
Consumer Cyclical
PSMJ
SRVR
-
Healthcare
PSMJ
SRVR
-
Industrials
PSMJ
SRVR
Consumer Defensive
PSMJ
SRVR
-
Energy
PSMJ
SRVR
Utilities
PSMJ
SRVR
Real Estate
PSMJ
SRVR
Basic Materials
PSMJ
SRVR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMJ vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
PSMJ
SRVR
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.13 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 0.76 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.92 | 1.64 | +22.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 0.67 | +2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.30 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -40.99% | +30.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | -14.78% | +11.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -18.34% | +7.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -12.28% | +12.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -15.27% | +13.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 6.83% | -6.16% |
Volatility
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 0.38%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMJ | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 5.47% | -5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.88% | 13.12% | -9.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.72% | 16.72% | -11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 19.71% | -10.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 21.44% | -12.49% |
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMJ vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF | 2.70% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMJ and SRVR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSMJ (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMJ dropped -10.87% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 3-year performance, PSMJ leads with 13.98% vs 8.85% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSMJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSMJ has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMJ.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSMJ.
PSMJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.60% for SRVR.
PSMJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMJ and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer