PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMJ vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


PSMJ

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.28%
YTD
4.52%
6M
5.30%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
4.52%13.29%14.06%19.80%-2.41%3.68%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMJ and SRVR is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

0.58

The correlation between PSMJ and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSMJ
SRVR

Technology

33.2%
6.8%

Financial Services

12.5%
0.9%

Communication Services

10.3%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%

-

Healthcare

9.6%

-

Industrials

8.4%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%

-

Energy

4.2%
3.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
66.4%

Basic Materials

1.9%
0.8%

Technology

PSMJ
33.2%
SRVR
6.8%

Financial Services

PSMJ
12.5%
SRVR
0.9%

Communication Services

PSMJ
10.3%
SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSMJ
10.0%
SRVR

-

Healthcare

PSMJ
9.6%
SRVR

-

Industrials

PSMJ
8.4%
SRVR
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSMJ
5.4%
SRVR

-

Energy

PSMJ
4.2%
SRVR
3.8%

Utilities

PSMJ
2.6%
SRVR
2.2%

Real Estate

PSMJ
2.0%
SRVR
66.4%

Basic Materials

PSMJ
1.9%
SRVR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSMJ vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMJ
PSMJ Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSMJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMJSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.13

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

0.76

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.92

1.64

+22.27

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMJ and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMJSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

0.67

+2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.30

+0.88

Drawdowns

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMJSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-40.99%

+30.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.70%

-14.78%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-18.34%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-12.28%

+12.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.37%

-15.27%

+13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

6.83%

-6.16%

Volatility

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 0.38%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSMJSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.38%

5.47%

-5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.88%

13.12%

-9.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.72%

16.72%

-11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

19.71%

-10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.95%

21.44%

-12.49%

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSMJ vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSMJ and SRVR have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSMJ (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMJ dropped -10.87% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 3-year performance, PSMJ leads with 13.98% vs 8.85% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSMJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSMJ has performed better with a 13.98% return vs 8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSMJ.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSMJ.

PSMJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.60% for SRVR.

PSMJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSMJ and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer