PSMJ vs. DBO
PSMJ (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMJ is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. PSMJ is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSMJ returned 13.98%/yr vs 21.86%/yr for DBO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSMJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
PSMJ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 4.52% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
PSMJ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 5.30%
- 1Y
- 16.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
PSMJ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 4.52% | 13.29% | 14.06% | 19.80% | -2.41% | 3.68% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 3.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMJ and DBO is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021 | 0.08 |
The correlation between PSMJ and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSMJ vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMJ
DBO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PSMJ
DBO
-
Financial Services
PSMJ
DBO
Communication Services
PSMJ
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSMJ
DBO
-
Healthcare
PSMJ
DBO
-
Industrials
PSMJ
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
PSMJ
DBO
-
Energy
PSMJ
DBO
-
Utilities
PSMJ
DBO
-
Real Estate
PSMJ
DBO
-
Basic Materials
PSMJ
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMJ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
PSMJ
DBO
PSMJ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMJ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.38 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 4.44 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.92 | 9.02 | +14.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMJ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 2.34 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | 0.02 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
PSMJ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMJ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.87% | -90.18% | +79.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.70% | -18.19% | +14.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -28.20% | +17.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.01% | -51.38% | +51.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -62.25% | +60.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 8.92% | -8.25% |
Volatility
PSMJ vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 0.38%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.61%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMJ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.38% | 12.61% | -12.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.88% | 28.20% | -24.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.72% | 34.46% | -28.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 32.29% | -23.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.95% | 31.78% | -22.83% |
PSMJ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMJ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
PSMJ Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMJ and DBO have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.61%) compared to PSMJ (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMJ dropped -10.87% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 3-year performance, DBO leads with 21.86% vs 13.98% for PSMJ. On fees, PSMJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DBO has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 13.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for PSMJ.
PSMJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMJ and 0.78% for DBO.
PSMJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMJ and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer