PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMD vs. KAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSMD vs. KAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and Scharf ETF (KAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMD achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly higher than KAT's -2.17% return.


PSMD

1D
-0.51%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
4.91%
6M
5.01%
1Y
13.69%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*

KAT

1D
0.20%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
-2.17%
6M
-2.56%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMD vs. KAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
4.91%4.10%
KAT
Scharf ETF
-2.17%0.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMD and KAT is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2025

0.62

PSMD vs. KAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSMD
KAT

Technology

34.1%
14.3%

Financial Services

12.6%
25.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

9.4%
22.3%

Industrials

8.0%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.3%

Energy

3.2%
6.6%

Utilities

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.3%

Technology

PSMD
34.1%
KAT
14.3%

Financial Services

PSMD
12.6%
KAT
25.1%

Communication Services

PSMD
11.2%
KAT
6.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PSMD
10.6%
KAT
5.0%

Healthcare

PSMD
9.4%
KAT
22.3%

Industrials

PSMD
8.0%
KAT
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

PSMD
5.0%
KAT
2.3%

Energy

PSMD
3.2%
KAT
6.6%

Utilities

PSMD
2.3%
KAT

-

Real Estate

PSMD
1.9%
KAT

-

Basic Materials

PSMD
1.8%
KAT
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSMD vs. KAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMD
PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

KAT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMD vs. KAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and Scharf ETF (KAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSMDKATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.22

PSMD vs. KAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSMD vs. KAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMD drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, which is greater than KAT's maximum drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMD and KAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMDKATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-9.25%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-7.38%

+6.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.65%

-3.35%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

Volatility

PSMD vs. KAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSMDKATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.75%

10.60%

-4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.63%

10.60%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.47%

10.60%

-2.13%

PSMD vs. KAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSMD and KAT have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

PSMD vs. KAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMD nor KAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KAT
Scharf ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSMD and KAT have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSMD and KAT have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

PSMD and KAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Scharf Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSMD and KAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer