PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLV vs. RISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSLV vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a -20.13% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 4.75% return.


PSLV

1D
0.48%
1M
-2.88%
6M
-26.78%
YTD
-20.13%
1Y
50.88%
3Y*
32.83%
5Y*
16.27%
10Y*
9.52%
ALL TIME*
4.12%

RISR

1D
-0.15%
1M
1.47%
6M
4.83%
YTD
4.75%
1Y
6.29%
3Y*
10.07%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$155.84M$136.78M$194.12M
$3.20M$3.07M$3.51M

PSLV vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-20.13%145.08%19.43%-1.94%2.74%4.43%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
4.75%4.63%24.20%7.02%31.98%-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PSLV and RISR is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLV vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSLV vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSLVRISRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

2.42

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

5.79

-3.83

PSLV vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLV and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSLV vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, which is greater than RISR's maximum drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and RISR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLVRISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.38%

-14.31%

-65.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.83%

-2.61%

-48.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.83%

-8.07%

-42.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.05%

-0.15%

-47.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.01%

-2.12%

-55.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.09%

1.09%

+25.00%

Volatility

PSLV vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) at 1.13%. This indicates that PSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLVRISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.17%

1.13%

+10.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

3.57%

+41.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.32%

5.25%

+56.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.55%

11.67%

+24.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.55%

11.67%

+19.88%

PSLV vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSLV has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSLV vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RISR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.88%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSLV and RISR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLV has higher volatility (11.17%) compared to RISR (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLV dropped -79.38% vs RISR's -14.31%.

On 3-year performance, PSLV leads with 32.83% vs 10.07% for RISR. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, RISR has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PSLV has performed better with a 32.83% return vs 10.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

RISR has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.

PSLV is categorized as Silver, while RISR is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for PSLV and 1.13% for RISR.

RISR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSLV and RISR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer