PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLDX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLDX achieves a 10.00% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PSLDX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 14.63%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.46% annualized return.


PSLDX

1D
0.21%
1M
5.66%
YTD
10.00%
6M
9.38%
1Y
34.01%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
5.94%
10Y*
14.63%

SICIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.45%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
6.54%
5Y*
3.20%
10Y*
3.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
10.00%20.34%15.41%27.93%-43.18%25.85%37.80%60.43%-9.31%33.07%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.46%8.12%5.52%5.29%-6.23%4.13%2.62%9.36%-2.07%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PSLDX and SICIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.79

The correlation between PSLDX and SICIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLDX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSLDX
PSLDX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PSLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLDXSICIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

2.53

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.77

3.73

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.48

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.76

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.05

10.77

-0.73

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLDX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLDXSICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

2.53

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.84

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.89

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.80

-0.12

Drawdowns

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLDX drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLDX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLDXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-27.62%

-27.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.70%

-2.65%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-3.21%

-20.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.32%

-10.94%

-38.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.32%

-11.61%

-37.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.35%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-3.57%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

0.68%

+2.70%

Volatility

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I (PSLDX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.73%. This indicates that PSLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLDXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

0.73%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.18%

2.11%

+11.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.37%

2.81%

+13.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.71%

3.88%

+18.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.32%

3.90%

+17.42%

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSLDX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSLDX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

PSLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.46%, more than SICIX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSLDX
PIMCO StocksPLUS Long Duration Fund Class I
9.46%12.92%15.23%3.67%2.66%38.80%12.89%18.91%15.58%24.52%11.55%12.08%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.84%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSLDX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLDX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to SICIX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLDX dropped -55.25% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

SICIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSLDX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer