PSLAX vs. BSCMX
PSLAX (Putnam Small Cap Value Fund) and BSCMX (Brandes Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PSLAX returned 6.87%/yr vs 15.52%/yr for BSCMX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSLAX charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BSCMX.
Performance
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSLAX achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly lower than BSCMX's 15.67% return.
PSLAX
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.73%
- YTD
- 14.44%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 26.11%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
BSCMX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 15.67%
- 6M
- 17.50%
- 1Y
- 41.78%
- 3Y*
- 25.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- —
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSLAX Putnam Small Cap Value Fund | 14.44% | 5.26% | 6.19% | 23.54% | -13.42% | 39.51% | 3.60% | 24.33% | -21.70% |
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 15.67% | 23.51% | 24.77% | 22.75% | -7.89% | 27.61% | 20.38% | 12.82% | -12.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSLAX and BSCMX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2018 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PSLAX and BSCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSLAX vs. BSCMX — Risk / Return Rank
PSLAX
BSCMX
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Small Cap Value Fund (PSLAX) and Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSLAX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.43 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.59 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 15.58 | -7.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSLAX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | 2.55 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.87 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.70 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, which is greater than BSCMX's maximum drawdown of -38.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLAX and BSCMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSLAX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -38.12% | -31.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -9.65% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.63% | -22.34% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.63% | -22.34% | -3.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.28% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -6.04% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 2.83% | +0.90% |
Volatility
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Volatility Comparison
Putnam Small Cap Value Fund (PSLAX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Brandes Small Cap Value Fund (BSCMX) at 4.57%. This indicates that PSLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSLAX | BSCMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 4.57% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.00% | 11.66% | +0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.34% | 17.35% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 17.89% | +3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.61% | 20.60% | +3.01% |
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSLAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCMX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSLAX vs. BSCMX - Dividend Comparison
PSLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than BSCMX's 3.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCMX Brandes Small Cap Value Fund | 3.93% | 4.54% | 2.31% | 3.50% | 2.93% | 4.38% | 1.76% | 1.11% | 9.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSLAX Putnam Small Cap Value Fund | 5.95% | 6.81% | 5.67% | 1.21% | 8.40% | 0.20% | 0.90% | 1.33% | 21.52% | 38.15% | 0.66% | 5.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSLAX and BSCMX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLAX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to BSCMX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLAX dropped -69.37% vs BSCMX's -38.12%.
BSCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSLAX and BSCMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer